(2017) Science and education, 12, 165-170. Odessa.

Nadiia Shcherbakova,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences),
associate professor, Department of Pedagogy,
Berdiansk State Pedagogical University,
4, Universyttska Str., Berdiansk, Ukraine

FUTURE TEACHERS TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF INSTRUCTIONAL DIALOGUE ORGANIZATION

The paper deals with an urgent theoretical and methodological issue of future teachers training in the field of instructional dialogue organization. At the present stage of the development of education as a science, special attention is focused on the necessity of humane relations between the educational process participants, which should be based on the principles of dialogue and partnership. However, not many modern teachers can build an educational process on a dialogical basis. The paper aims to substantiate the theoretical and methodological principles of future teachers training in the field of instructional dialogue organization. The process of training that will ensure the readiness of future teachers to organize an instructional dialogue with students is a structural-functional model, which includes such elements as purpose, components, pedagogical conditions and the result – their skills of the instructional dialogue organization. The carried out work shows that the study of the normative educational course “Pedagogy” on the basis of personal, contextual and activity approaches with the use of educational projects by students as part of self-study provided the experimental technique with sufficient effectiveness.

future teachers training in the field of instructional dialogue organization, educational projects, personal, context, activity approaches, instructional dialogue.

1. Burman, L. V. (2000). Dydaktychni umovy formuvannia dialohichnykh umin u studentiv vyshhykh navchalnykh zakladiv [Didactic conditions of the formation of dialogical skills in university higher educational institutions: the author's abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of pedagogical sciences]. Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Kryvyi Righ [in Ukrainian].
2. Bush, G. (1984). Dialogika i tvorchestvo [Dialogue and creativity]. Riga: Avots [in Ukrainian].
3. Ghlazkova, I. (2007). Navchalnyi dialoh u profesiinii diialnosti maibutnioho vchytelia [Educational dialogue in the professional activity of the future teacher]. Donetsk: TOV «Jugho-Vostok, Ltd» [in Ukrainian].
4. Yevtukh, M. (2002). Priorytety profesiinoi pidhotovky vchytelia v systemi universytetskoi osvity [Priorities of teacher training in the system of university education]. Rozvytok pedahohichnoi i psykholohichnoi nauk v Ukraini 1992-2002 : Zb. nauk. pr. do 10-richchia APN Ukrajiny: U 2 ch. – Development of pedagogical and psychological sciences in Ukraine, 1992-2002: collection of articles/scientist works to the 10th anniversary of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine: 2 vol , Part 2. - P.66-76 [in Ukrainian].
5. Koval, L. (2012). Profesijna pidghotovka majbutnikh uchyteliv u konteksti rozvytku pochatkovoji osvity [Professional training of future teachers in the context of the development of primary education]. Donecjk : LANDON-KhKhI [in Ukrainian].
6. Korotaeva, O. (2010). Kuljtura uchebnogho dyalogha v obrazovateljnom processe [Culture of educational dialogue in the educational process]. Yzvestyja Akademyy pedaghoghycheskykh y socyaljnыkh nauk : materyalы nauchno-praktycheskoj konferencyy – News of the Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences: materials of the scientific-practical conference (pp 641- 649).Moskva: MODЭK [in Russian].
7. Matvienko, O.V., (2009). Pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv do pedaghoghichnoi vzaiemodii [Preparation of future teachers for pedagogical interaction]. Kyiv, NPU im. M.P. Draghomanova [in Ukrainian].
8. Pidborskyi, J. G., (2012). Zastosuvannia dialohovykh tekhnolohi u navchalno-vykhovnomu protsesi [Application of Dialog Technology in the Educational Process] Visnyk LNU im. Tarasa Shevchenka - Bulletin of the LNU Taras Shevchenko, 22 (257), 132-138 (рр. 132- 138) [in Ukrainian].
9. Rodzhers, K., & Frejbergh, D. (2002). Svoboda uchytjsja [The liberty to study] - Moskva, Smysl [in Russian].
10. Sysoieva, S. O. (1996). Pidhotovka vchytelia do formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti uchnia [Teacher preparation for the formation of student's creative personality]. Kiev: Polygraphknyha [in Ukrainian].
11. Shcherbakova, N. (2016). Professional Training Teachers No Nurture The Culture Of Pupils` Behavior. International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (I JSEIro), 3. (pp. 93 – 99). Педагогіка – Education Science and Education, 2017, Issue 12 170
12. Gift, R. T. (1994). Emphasizing the personal in research of teacher's thinking, Jeaching & teacher education. –– Vol. 10(1). – (p. 21)
13. Nolen, S. B. (1994). A place to begin in research on students' motivation: teacher’s , Teaching & teacher education. –– Vоl. 10(1). (pp. 65 – 71).