(2025) Science and education, 4, 32-41. Odessa.

Inna Grabchuk,
Candidate of Economic Sciences, majoring in Economics and Business Management,
Associate Professor at the Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Tourism, 
Polissia National University, 
7, Staryy Bulvar, Zhytomyr, Ukraine,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5548-6034

Lina Sikoraka,
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, majoring in Theory and Methods of Vocational Education,
Associate Professor at the Department of Natural Sciences and Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, 
Zhytomyr Medical Institute Zhytomyr Regional Council,
46/15, Velyka Berdychivska Str., Zhytomyr, Ukraine,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-4785-1086

Tetyana Glyuza,
Master, 
Polissia National University,
Staryy Bulvar, 7, Zhytomyr, Ukraine,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0832-2584

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF INNOVATIVE PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT STYLE IN RELATION TO INCREASING MOTIVATION AND WORK EFFICIENCY IN THE ORGANIZATION

The relevance of the study is due to the change in the paradigm of modern management, where democratic and innovative approaches to labor organization are gaining increasing importance. In conditions of high competition, rapid changes and the growing role of human capital, traditional authoritarian-bureaucratic leadership styles are losing their effectiveness. Instead, the emphasis shifts to the employee's personality, motivation, creativity, emotional intelligence, and ability to collaborate. In this context, the innovative participative leadership style is seen as one of the most promising approaches, which combines the effectiveness of the organization's personnel management with the development of its socio-psychological potential. The purpose of the study is to scientifically substantiate and systematically analyze the psychological factors of the innovative participatory management style and determine its impact on employee motivation and work efficiency in the organization. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were set: to classify the key psychological factors of participative management; to reveal their influence on work behavior; to characterize the role of this style in the formation of a favorable socio-psychological climate and increasing the efficiency of the work team; substantiate the practical principles of its application. Research methods include analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, as well as a systemic-structural approach, which provided a comprehensive study of the structural components of the participative leadership style. The use of such methods allowed us to identify motivational, cognitive, communicative, and emotional-volitional factors that determine the effectiveness of personnel work in the organization and propose an author’s model of psychological factors of an innovative participatory leadership style, which demonstrates how specific psychological factors of leadership affect motivation, involvement, and work performance in an organization. The results of the study showed that the effectiveness of the innovative participatory style largely depends on the leader's emotional intelligence, ability for empathy, two-way communication skills, trust in staff, and support for employee autonomy. The findings confirm that the innovative participative leadership style is an effective management model that helps increase staff motivation, form innovative behavior, and strengthen the competitiveness of the organization.

psychological factors, innovative participatory management style, motivation, effectiveness of management processes

1. Akademichnyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Academic Explanatory Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. (1970–1980). V 11 т. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. Retrieved from https://sum.in.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
2. Honcharenko, S. U. (1997). Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi slovnyk [Ukrainian pedagogical dictionary]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
3. Zakharkevych, N. P., & Trubaichuk, R. V. (2021). Rozvytok partysypatyvnoho upravlinnia na vitchyznianykh pid- pryiemstvakh [Development of participatory management at domestic enterprises]. Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law, 46–54 [in Ukrainian].
4. Kyfiak, V. I., & Kindzerskyi, V. V. (2020). Upravlinnia personalom yak osnovnyi biznes-protses pidpryiemstv [Personnel management as a key business process of enterprises]. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia “Ekonomika”, 827, 21–29 [in Ukrainian].
5. Kolisnichenko, N. (2021). Partysypatyvne upravlinnia v haluzi osvity: sutnist, osoblyvosti, tendentsii formuvannia i realizatsii [Participatory management in education: essence, features, trends]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 3(84), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330ap-pa3842021246301 [in Ukrainian].
6. Lavryniuk, O., & Kyrychenko, V. (2023). Motyvatsiia do navchalnoi diialnosti: analiz suchasnykh teorii [Motivation for learning: analysis of modern theories]. Zhurnal sotsialnoi ta praktychnoi psykholohii, 1, 34–39. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-2023-1-6 [in Ukrainian].
7. Mykytiuk, S. O., & Mykytiuk, S. S. (2021). Motyvatsiia navchalnoi diialnosti yak resurs osvitnoho protsesu [Learning motivation as a resource of the educational process]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoho yurydychnoho universytetu imeni Yaroslava Mudroho, 76(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2021.76-2.21 [in Ukrainian].
8. Ohnev’iuk, V. O. (2003). Osvita v systemi tsinnostei staloho liudskoho rozvytku [Education in the system of sustainable human development values]. (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Pavko, A. (2024). Ukrainska fundamentalna nauka – intelektualnyi chynnyk formuvannia tradytsii ta tsinnostei yevropeiskoi tsyvilizatsii [Ukrainian fundamental science as an intellectual factor of forming European values]. Visnyk KNU im. T. Shevchenka. Filosofiia, 1(10), 26–31. https://doi.org/ 10.17721/2523-4064.2024/10-5/11 [in Ukrainian].
10. Petrenko, V. V., & Vasylenko, O. M. (2020). Profesiina spriamovanist ta chynnyky vyboru profesii studentamy zakladiv vyshchoi osvity [Professional orientation and factors influencing students’ career choice]. Aktualni pytannia sotsial noi roboty: nadbannia, problemy, perspektyvy, 1, 90–93. Retrieved from https://elar.khmnu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bit-streams/066b60e1-a51d-407b-bfa9-151b30b48e3a/content [in Ukrainian].
11. Stryzheus, L. V. (2013). Osoblyvosti rozvytku “ekonomiky uchasti” v orhanizatsii [Features of the development of “participation economy” in an organization]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 4. Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1941 [in Ukrainian].
12. Sherman, M., Puhovskiy, E., Kambalova, Y., & Kdyrova, I. (2022). The future of distance education in war or the education of the future (the Ukrainian case study). Futurity Education, 2(3), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.57125/ FED/2022.10.11.30 [in English].
13. Escriva-Boulley G., Tessier D., Sarrazin P. (2012). La motivation autodéterminée. L’engagement des élèves en EPS, 6, 67–75. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331297209_L’engagement_des_eleves_en_EPS_ la_motivation_autodeterminee [in French].
14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 [in English].
15. Maister, D. (2024). True professionalism. New York: Free Press [in English].
16. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row [in English]