(2025) Science and education, 2, 46-58. Odessa.
Anzhela Myshenina,
Postgraduate Student at the Department of Theory and Methods of Practical Psychology,
The state institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odesa, Ukraine,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6900-0155
Oleksii Chebykin,
Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Full member of NAPS of Ukraine,
Full Professor, Department of Theory and Methods of Practical Psychology,
The state institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
26, Staroportofrankivska, Str., Odesa, Ukraine,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-2708
PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF FEMALE ATTRACTIVENESS IN SOCIAL AND COMMUNICATIVE INTERACTION WITHIN PROFESSIONAL SETTINGS
SUMMARY:
The article presents the results of a theoretical and empirical study devoted to the study of psychological characteristics of female attractiveness in social and communicative interaction in the context of professional activity. The relevance of the problem is determined by the growing role of interpersonal interaction in the professional environment, where the level and style of female attractiveness are important factors in communication. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of female attractiveness on the comfort of social and communicative interaction in the context of professional activity. The methods of theoretical analysis (generalisation, systematisation, classification of scientific literature, logical-semantic and content analysis of the categories of the subject of research) and empirical research using the modified scale of female attractiveness by O. Chebikina, A. Klench) and the author’s questionnaire “Assessment of the influence of gender characteristics on professional and social interaction”, which made it possible to diagnose styles and levels of attractiveness, formal and informal socio-psychological interaction of the subjects with men and women in professional activities. The results were processed using descriptive statistics, correlation and dispersion analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics 21. As a result, five main components of attractiveness were identified: physical, emotional, cognitive, communicative and social-role. It was found that the physical and social role components are dominant in creating a positive first impression, while the emotional, cognitive and communicative components need to be developed. It was revealed that a combination of a high level of physical attractiveness with a developed social role contributes to more effective achievement of professional goals in the field of communication. Positive correlations were found between the level and style of attractiveness (soft, bright, formal, mixed) and the feeling of comfort in professional interaction. It has been proven that the level of attractiveness is an important determinant of women’s communicative effectiveness in a professional environment. The conclusions emphasise that the level of attractiveness is a significant determinant of women’s communicative effectiveness in the professional environment, and styles of attractiveness act as mechanisms of adaptation and means of improving social and communicative comfort. The results obtained can be used in practical psychology, HR management, personal development training, and gender-oriented programmes to improve professional interaction.
KEYWORDS:
woman, female attractiveness, social and communicative interaction, professional activity, styles of attractiveness, levels of attractiveness, psychological comfort
FULL TEXT:
REFERENCES:
- Bielavin, S. Р. (2020). Osoblyvosti sotsialnoi komunikatsii ta vzaiemodii studentskoi molodi v polietnichnomu prostori Ukrainy [Peculiarities of social communication nd interaction of student youth in polyethnical space of Ukraine]. Vcheni zapysky Tavriiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. I. Vernadskoho, Seriia Psykholohiia – Scientific Notes of Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University, Series Psychology, 1, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32838/2709-3093/2020.1/01 [in Ukrainian].
- Haidukevych, K., & Polishchuk, L. (2023). Emotsiinyi intelekt yak vazhlyva skladova uspikhu v profesiinii diialnosti ivent-menedzhera [Emotional intelligence as an essential component of an event manager’s professional success]. Pytannia kulturolohii – Issues in cultural Studies, 41, 78–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1311.41.2023.276695 [in Ukrainian].
- Serhiieva, I. V., Fatalchuk, S. D., & Fedotova, S. M. (2025). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti mizhpersonalnoi vzaiemodii pratsivnykiv u vyrobnychomu kolektyvi [Psychological features of interpersonal interaction of employees in a production team]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Psykholohiia – Scientific Notes. Series: Psychology, 1, 138–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/cusu-psy-2025-1-18 [in Ukrainian].
- Serdiuk, N. (2021). Atraktsiinist yak zaporuka efek- tyvnoi konsulʹtatyvnoi diialnosti psykholoha [Attractiveness as a key to effective psychological counseling]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Psykholohiia – Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Psychology, 32 (71), 70–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32838/2709-3093/2021.3/11 [in Ukrainian].
- Sytnik, S., & Chebykin, O. (2020). Osoblyvosti mizhpersonalnoi vzaiemodii psykholohiv z riznym rivnem sotsialnoho intelektu [Peculiarities of interpersonal interaction of psychologists with different levels of social intelligence]. Nauka i osvita – Science and Education, 1, 41–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2020-1-6 [in Ukrainian].
- Khomych, H., & Shamardak, Yu. (2019). Atraktsiia yak skladova mizhpersonalnoi pertseptsii u profesiinii diialnosti psykholoha [Attraction as a component of interpersonal perception in the professional activity of a psycho- logist]. Humanitarium, 42 (1), 189–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2308-5126-2019-42-1-189-197 [in Ukrainian].
- Chebykin, O., & Klenchu, A. (2012). Psykholohiia atraktyvnosti divchyny [The psychology of a girl’s attractivenes]. Odesa : Vydavets M. P. Cherkasov [in Ukrainian].
- Abbasi, Z., Billsberry, J., & Todres, M. (2023). Empirical studies of the “similarity leads to attraction” hypothesis in workplace interactions: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 74, 661–709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00313-5 [in English].
- Buggio, L., Vercellini, P., Somigliana, E., Viganò, P., Frattaruolo, M.P., & Fedele, L. (2012). You are so beautiful: Behind women’s attractiveness towards the biology of reproduction: A narrative review. Gynecological Endocrinology, 28, 753–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2012.6 62545 [in English].
- Chen, D., Yao, Z., Liu, J., Wu, H., & Hu, X. (2024). Social conformity updates the neural representation of facial attractiveness. Communications Biology, 7, 1360–1369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06791-5 [in English].
- Cross, N., Kiefner-Burmeister, A., Rossi, J., Borushok, J., Hinman, N., Burmeister, J., & Carels, R. (2017). Facial attractiveness, weight status, and personality trait attribution: The role of attractiveness in weight stigma. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 11, 377–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2016.03.007 [in English].
- Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. (2011). Women’s meta- perceptions of attractiveness and their relations to body image. Body Image, 8 (1), 74–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.09.007 [in English].
- Durkee, P., Polo, P., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Rodríguez-Ruiz, C., Losada-Pérez, M., Fernández-Martínez, A., Turiégano, E., Buss, D. M., & Pita, M. (2019). Men’s Bodily Attractiveness: Muscles as Fitness Indicators. Evolutionary Psychology, 17, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919852918 [in English].
- Fisher, M., & Voracek, M. (2006). The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2, 190–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2006.00249.x [in English].
- Groyecka, A., Pisanski, K., Sorokowska, A., Havlíček, J., Karwowski, M., Puts, D., Roberts, S. & Sorokowski, P. (2017) Attractiveness Is Multimodal: Beauty Is Also in the Nose and Ear of the Beholder. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00778 [in English].
- Hill, C. T., Nelson, S. S., & Perlman, D. (2023). What influences judgments of physical attractiveness? A comprehensive perspective with implications for mental health. International Review of Psychiatry, 35 (1), 42–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2023.2172998 [in English].
- Horton, R. S. (2003). Similarity and attractiveness in social perception: differentiating between biases for the self and the beautiful. Self and identity, 2 (2), 137–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309033 [in English].
- Johnson, S., Keplinger, K., Kirk, J., & Chan, E. (2018). The perils of pretty: Effects of personal appearance on women’s careers. In A.M. Broadbridge & S.L. Fielden (Eds.). Research handbook of diversity and careers, 8, 129–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365607.00016 [in English].
- Kaschel, P., & Hildebrandt, L. (2023). Can beauty be measured with photos? A systematic review and meta-analysis on static and dynamic physical attractiveness ratings. International review of social psychology, 36, 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.758 [in English].
- Lennon, S. J. (1990). Effects of Clothing Attractiveness on Perceptions. Home Economics Research Journal, 18 (4), 303–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727x9001800403 [in English].
- Liu, M., Sommer, W., Yue, S., & Li, W. (2023). Dominance of face over voice in human attractiveness judgments: ERP evidence. Psychophysiology, 60 (11), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14358 [in English].
- Menegatti, M., Pireddu, S., Crocetti, E., Moscatelli, S., & Rubini, M. (2021). The Ginevra de’ Benci Effect: competence, morality, and attractiveness inferred from faces predict hiring decisions for women. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658424 [in English].
- Miller, G. F. (2023). Multidimensional indicators as enablers on perception of facial beauty and appearance among Indian population: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 16, 292–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcas.jcas_208_22 [in English].
- Miller, G. F. (2000). Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence. In G. Bock, J. Goode, & K. Webb (Eds.), The nature of intelligence. Novartis Foundation Symposium, 233, 260–275. John Wiley [in English].
- Niimi, R., & Goto, M. (2023). Good conduct makes your face attractive: The effect of personality perception on facial attractiveness judgments. PLOS ONE, 18 (2), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281758 [in English].
- Schreiber, R., Hess, M., Grichnik, D., Shepherd, D., Tobler, P., & Wincent, J. (2024). An attractiveness bias? How women entrepreneurs’ physical appearance affects men investors. Journal of Management, 6, 1–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241249699 [in English].
- Shinners, Е. (2009). Effects of The «What is Beautiful is Good» Stereotype on Perceived Trustworthiness. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, 12, 1–5 [in English].
- Sinkman, Е. (2013). The Psychology of Beauty: Creation of a Beautiful Self. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group [in English].
- Tan, L., Folwarczny, M., Otterbring, T., & Li, N. P. (2024). Hot at the Top: The Influence of Self-Rated Attractiveness on Self-Perceived Status. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 7, 100–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100205 [in English].
- Zhuravliova, L., Kolomiiets, T., & Shmygliuk, O. (2020). Psychological peculiarities of the interpersonal interaction in adolescence. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 12: Psykholohichni nauky – Scientific Journal of NPU named after M. P. Drahomanov. Series 12: Psychological Sciences, 12, 58–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31392/npu-nc.series12.2020.9(54).05 [in English].