Lyudmila Nikolenko THE ROLE OF A SPECIAL STRUCTURAL UNIT IN THE FORMATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL SPACE IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

(2025) Science and education, 2, 87-92. Odessa.

Lyudmila Nikolenko,
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences,
Associate Professor at the Department of Pedagogy, Preschool and Special Education,
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University,
72, Nauky Ave., Dnipro, Ukraine,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-3117


THE ROLE OF A SPECIAL STRUCTURAL UNIT IN THE FORMATION OF AN INCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL SPACE IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS


SUMMARY:

The article addresses the issue of creating an inclusive educational space in higher education institutions (HEIs). Given the requirements for improving the quality of training for future specialists, the issue of systematic organisation of support and assistance for persons with special educational needs in higher education institutions is becoming a priority for scientific and applied interest.The purpose of the article is to determine the role of a special structural unit in the system of forming an inclusive educational space in HEIs.The study uses a set of methods characteristic of the humanities and social sciences: comparative analysis, systematisation, generalisation and forecasting.Analysis of sources made it possible to structure information about the functions of inclusive support centres in different countries, as well as to identify common support clusters: inclusive policy, community involvement, staff training and resource provision.The results of the study show that the special unit plays a consolidating role, combining the efforts of higher education institutions and external stakeholders in providing individual and group forms of support to applicants with SEN. Its main tasks are: information and advisory activities; organisation of training and professional development for teachers and volunteers; development and monitoring of individual training plans; assessment of the needs of applicants and HEI resources; coordination of technical, social and legal support; participation in the development of policies and methodological materials.Thus, the article proves that the effectiveness of an inclusive educational space in higher education institutions largely depends on the clear functioning of a special unit for supporting persons with SEN. Its activities must be standardised, technologically supported and integrated into the management system of the higher education institution in order to achieve equal educational opportunities and improve the quality of professional training for applicants with SEN.


KEYWORDS:

inclusion, inclusive education, higher education students with special educational needs, inclusive learning, inclusive educational space, support for people with special educational needs


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:
  1. But, T. (2015). Indeks inkliuzii: rozvytok navchan- nia ta uchasti v zhyttiediialnosti shkil [Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools]. (O. Yakovenko, Trans.). Kyiv : Vydavnychyi dim “Pleiady”. URL: https://rcpio.ippo.kubg.edu.ua/?p=1044 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (2019, July 10). Postanova № 635 “Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku orhanizatsii inkliuzyvnoho navchannia u zakladakh vyshchoi osvity” [Resolution No. 635 “On approval of the procedure for organiz- ing inclusive education in higher education institutions”]. Retrieved from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatver-dzhennya-poryadku-organizaciyi-inklyuzivnogo-navchan-nya-u-zakladah-vishchoyi-osviti-i100719 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Nikolenko, L. (2024). Inkliuzyvnyi osvitnii prostir u zakladi vyshchoi osvity: Monohrafiia [Inclusive educational space in a higher education institution: Monograph]. Dnipro : Vydavnytstvo “Hrani”. Retrieved from: https://grani-print.dp.ua/index.php/home/2220243 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Nikolenko, L. (2025). Praktyka orhanizatsii inkliuzyvnoho navchannia v yevropeiskykh zakladakh vyshchoi osvity (pryklad Chekhii ta Slovachchyny) [Practice of organizing inclusive education in European higher education institutions (example of the Czech Republic and Slovakia)]. Osvita osib z osoblyvymy potrebamy: shliakhy rozbudovy, 1 (26), 138–152. URL: https://doi.org/10.33189/epsn.v1i26.282 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Tverezovska, N., & Tarnavska, T. (2012). Osmyslennia poniattia “systema” v riznykh haluziakh naukovykh znan [Understanding the concept of “system” in various fields of scientific knowledge]. Osvitnii vymir, 35, 320–331. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352271293_Osmislenna_ponatta_sistema_v_riznih_galuzah_naukovih_ znan [in Ukrainian].
  6. Baltaru, R. D. (2022). The rise of agentic inclusion in the UK universities: Maintaining reputation through (formal) diversification. Studies in Higher Education, 47 (1), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.17390 [in English].
  7. Das, M. B., Fisiy, C. F., & Kyte, R. (2013). Inclusion matters: The foundation for shared prosperity. Washington, DC : World Bank. Retrieved from: h t t p s : / / d o c u m e n t s 1 . w o r l d b a n k . o rg / c u r a t e d / e n /114561468154469371/pdf/Inclusion-matters-the-foundation- for-shared-prosperity.pdf [in English].
  8. Filippou, K., Emmanuel, O., & Bengs, A. (2025). Inclusive policies and practices in higher education: A systematic literature review. Review of Education. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70034 [in English].
  9. Katz, H. T., & Acquah, E. O. (2021). The role of schools in providing educational opportunity: An integrative review. Review of Education, 9 (3). Retrieved from: https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rev3.3307 [in English].
  10. Klein, V., Silonova, V., & Hladush, V. (2019). Actual problems of educational integration students in the Slovak Republic. Aktualni pytannia korektsiinoi osvity. Pedahohichni nauky, 13, 48–61. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/275581721.pdf [in English].
  11. Koutsouris, G., Stentiford, L., & Norwich, B. (2022). A critical exploration of inclusion policies of elite UK universities. British Educational Research Journal, 48, 878–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3799 [in English].
  12. Lister, K., Pearson, V. K., Collins, T. D., & Davies, G. J. (2021). Evaluating inclusion in distance learning: A survey of university staff attitudes, practices and training needs. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34 (3), 321–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020. 182804 [in English].
  13. Loreman, T. (2007). Seven pillars of support for inclusive education: Moving from “Why?” to “How?”. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 3, 22–38. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236029238_Seven_pillars_of_support_for_inclusive_education_Moving_from_Why_to_How [in English].
  14. Moriña, A., & Biagiotti, G. (2022). Inclusion at university, transition to employment and employability of graduates with disabilities: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 93, 102647. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059322000979 [in English].
  15. Tomlinson, M. (2021). A sociology of special and inclusive education: Insights from the UK, US, Germany and Finland. In A. Kopfer, J. Powell, & R. Zahnd (Eds.), International handbook of inclusive education: Global, national and local perspectives (Рp. 59–74). Verlag Barbara Budrich. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1f70kvj.6 [in English].
         

       
   
   
         

 

©2025 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.