(2025) Science and education, 1, 58-65. Odessa.
Mariia Shepelova,
Candidate of Psychological Sciences,
Senior Researcher, Psychology of Creativity Department
H.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine,
2, Pankivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-4997
THE TYPES OF PERSONALITY AND PREFERENCES OF COGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN ARTISTIC CREATION OF YOUTH
SUMMARY:
The current study investigated preferences for cognitive strategies in artistic creation in students with different types of personality, defined by the relation between aesthetic sensibility and depression. The purpose of the research is to reveal the differences between different personality types of students in their preference for cognitive strategies in artistic creation. Methods: The typology, developed by F.M. Podshyvailov, L.I. Podshyvailova, M.V. Shepelova (2020), was used for defining the students’ personality types. There are 4 types of students by the relation of aesthetic sensibility and depression: I type “Avatarity”; II type “Individity”; III type “Vitality”; IV type “Personality”. A questionnaire “Artistic orientation of paintings perception” was used for the assessment of preference for cognitive strategies in the artistic activity of students. We hypothesized that the differences in students' preference for cognitive strategies are due to their personality type. The results revealed that there are significant differences between the III-type and I, II, IV-types of students in the value of Analogization, namely, the III-type has the lowest mean value of this indicator among all types; II-type – is the highest. There are also significant differences between the III-type and I, II-types of students in the value of Demonstration, namely the III-type has the lowest mean value of this indicator among all types; II-type – is the highest. Students with different types of personality seem to have different preferences for cognitive strategies in artistic activity, namely Analogization and Demonstration of the artist's personality in a work of art. Thus, the differences in Combination and Reconstruction are not statistically significant. The results claim the necessity of artistic perception development, especially including cognitive strategies as a property that directs a personality to achieve harmony with the environment in the process of interaction.
KEYWORDS:
types of personality, aesthetic sensibility, depression, cognitive strategy, artistic creation, youth
FULL TEXT:
REFERENCES:
2. Cosentino, A.C., & Castro Solano, A. (2017). The High Five: Associations of the five positive factors with the Big Five and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1250. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01250.
3. Furnham, A. (1997). Personality and preference for surreal paintings. Personality and Individual Differences, 23 (6), 923–935. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00131-1 [in English].
4. Gjermunds, N., Brechan, I., Johnsen, S. & Watten, R. (2020). Personality traits in musicians. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8 (2), 100–107 [in English]
5. Joyner, Ch., Rhodes, R., & Loprinzi, P. (2018). The Prospective Association Between the Five Factor Personality Model with Health Behaviors and Health Behavior Clusters. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14 (4), 880–896. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1450 [in English].
6. Kajonius, P. & Johnson, J. (2019). Assessing the Structure of the Five Factor Model of Personality (IPIPNEO-120) in the Public Domain. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 15 (2), 260–275. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1671 [in English].
7. Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd Edition (2010) Oxford University Press, 2112 [in English].
8. Palmiero, M., Piccardi, L., Giancola, M., Nori, R. & Guariglia, P. (2023). The Effect of Sadness on Visual Artistic Creativity in Non-Artists. Brain Sci., 13, 149. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010149 [in English].
9. Podshyvailov, F.M., Podshyvailova, L.Y., Shepelova, M.V. (2020). The construction of students’ pypology by the relation of aesthetic sensibility and depression. Technologies of intellect development, 2020. Vol. 4, 3 (28). http://doi.org/10.31108/3.2020.4.3.12 [in English].
10. Rawlings, D., Barrantes, N. & Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and Aesthetic Preference in Spain and England: Two Studies Relating Sensation Seeking and Openness to Experience to Liking for Paintings and Music. European Journal of Personality, 14, 553–576. DOI: 10.1002/1099-0984(200011/12)14:6<553::AIDPER384>3.0.CO;2-H [in English].
11. Saarinen, J. (2015). The Concept of the Oceanic Feeling in Artistic Creativity and in the Analysis of Visual Artworks. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 49 (3), 15–31. DOI: 10.5406/jaesteduc.49.3.0015 [in English].
12. Shepelova, M. (2019). The personality characteristics in students’ artistic activity. Technologies of intellect development, Vol. 3, 3 (24). DOI: 10.31108/3.2019.3.3.5 [in English].
13. Viljoen, M. (2012). The Relationship between Personality and Learning in Visual Art. Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 31, 1. DOI: 10.1080/09718923.2012.11893013 [in English].
14. Wanrong, X. (2022). The Associations Between Artistic Creativity and Resilience Among High School Female Students in Beijing. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 638, 786–790. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.220110.149 [in English].
16. Moliako, V.O. (2008). Metodolohichni ta teoretychni problemy doslidzhennia tvorchoi diialnosti [Theoretical and methodological problems of creative activity research]. Stratehii tvorchoi diialnosti: shkola V.O. Moliako. V. O. Moliako (Ed.). Kyiv, 7–5 [in Ukrainian].
17. Podshyvailov, F.M. (2019). Poshuk synerhetychnykh efektiv vzaiemodii systemoutvoriuiuchykh parametriv akademichnoi obdarovanosti [ The search of synergetic effects of academic giftedness parameters’ system-creative factors interaction]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology: Scientific works collection of H.S. Kostiuk institute of psychology of NAES of Ukraine, 12 (26), 262–276 [in Ukrainian].
18. Podshyvailov, F.M., Podshyvailova, L.Y., Shepelova, M.V. (2020). Psykholohichna kharakterystyka typiv studentiv za spivvidnoshenniam intehralnykh vlastyvostei osobystosti ta indyvidnosti [Psychological characteristics of students’ types on the relation of integral attributes of personality and individity]. Psykholohichnyi chasopys – Psychological journal, 6, 7 (39), 61–84. DOI: 0.31108/1.2020.6.7.6 [in Ukrainian].
19. Podshyvailova, L.I., Shepelova, M.V. (2017). Pertseptyvno-myslennieva stratehiia yak vlastyvist osobystosti [Perceptive-mental strategy as a property of personality]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology: Scientific works collection of H.S. Kostiuk institute of psychology of NAES of Ukraine, 12 (23), 263–277 [in Ukrainian].
20. Shepelova, M.V. (2018). Proiavy pertseptyvno-myslennievykh stratehii u khudozhnii diialnosti studentiv [The manifestations of perceptive-mental strategies in students’ artistic activity]. Pertseptyvno-myslennievi stratehii tvorchoho konstruiuvannia informatsiinykh system u navchalnii ta trudovii diialnosti: monohrafiia. V.O. Moliako, Yu.A. Hulko, N.A. Vahanova [et al.]; V. O. Moliako (Ed.). Kyiv, 106–123. URL: http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/712092/ [in Ukrainian].
