(2022) Science and education, 4, 49-56. Odessa.

Olena Kosyanova,
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Аssociate Professor,
Department of Theory and Methods of Practical Psychology,
The State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odesa, Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-9981

Kateryna Kyrychenko,
2nd-year Postgraduate Student
Department of Theory and Methods of Practical Psychology,
The State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odesa, Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5110-4294

Minka Kiminchizhy,
2nd-year Postgraduate Student
Department of Theory and Methods of Practical Psychology,
The State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odesa, Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-0530

FEATURES OF SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION IN PERSONS WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NEUROTISATION

The article examines the results of research into the psychological features of activity regulation and social-psychological adaptation in individuals with different levels of neuroticism. A hypothesis is put forward regarding the presence of neuroticism on the components of social-psychological adaptation in persons working in the field of management. A common complex of methods was selected: a method for diagnosing social and psychological adaptation (Diamond R.E., 2004), a method for diagnosing self-assessment of mental states (Eysenck G., 1963), a method for diagnosing the level of neurotization (Wasserman L.I., 1987 r.), a method of measuring rigidity (Eysenck G., 1965), a method of express diagnosis of neurosis (Hess H., Heck K., 1975). Empirical research made it possible to identify and quantify the level of neuroticism in respondents and the peculiarities of their psychological state, including the level of adaptation, self-acceptance, acceptance of others, emotional comfort, internality, desire to dominate, anxiety, aggressiveness, frustration, rigidity, etc. The analysis and comparison of the results showed that the level of neuroticism really has an impact on the features of socio-psychological adaptation and its components. It was found that when the level of neuroticism increases, psychological regulation of activity and socio-psychological adaptation of a person deteriorates. It has been shown that respondents with high neuroticism have an increased level of anxiety, frustration and rigidity, as well as tension and difficulty in adaptation. Such individuals do not fully accept themselves and others, have a worse level of emotional comfort, they have a reduced level of desire to dominate, and they often attribute responsibility for the results of their activities or the situation around them to other circumstances or the "decision" of fate. Respondents with a low level of neuroticism have better indicators of psychological regulation of their activities and social-psychological adaptation.

psychological regulation of activity, socio-psychological adaptation, levels of neuroticism, adaptation, influence of neuroticism on adaptation.

1. Актуальні проблеми психології. Т. 3: Консультативна психологія і психотерапія / За ред. С.Д. Максименка, З.Г. Кісарчук. Київ, 2002. 177 с.
2. Костюк О.В. Психологічні особливості невротизації майбутніх лікарів в умовах трилінгвізму : дис. канд. психолог. наук : 19.00.04 – Медична психологія ; Інститут психології імені Г.С. Костюка НАПН України, 2020.
3. Косьянова Олена. Психологічні особливості регуляції діяльності та соціально–психологічної адаптації у менеджерів з різним рівнем невротизації. Наука і освіта. 2022. № 1. 55–62.
4. Основи соціальної психології : підручник для закладів вищої освіти / За ред. М. М. Слюсаревського. Київ : Талком, 2018. 580 с.
5. Татенко В. Суб’єктно-вчинкова парадигма в сучасній психології. Соціальна психологія. 2006. № 1(15). C. 3–13.
6. Dukalski, B., Suslow, T., Egloff, B., Kersting, A., & Donges, U.-S. (2019) Implicit and explicit self-concept of neuroticism in borderline personality disorder. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2019.1582694
7. Kosianova O., Pylypenko, N., Shevchenko, N., Formaniuk, Y., Herasina, S., Horetska, O. (2022) (Web of Science). Psychotherapeutic Counseling in Promoting Personal Development. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience. 13(3). 119–137. URL: https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.3/357
8. Krian, Z., & Hisler, G. (2019). Personality and sleep: Neuroticism and conscientiousness predict behaviourally recorded sleep years later. European Journal of Personality. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2191
9. Ma X, Meng G, Tan Y, et al. (2018) Patient and Family Caregiver’s Neuroticism and Conscientiousness Personality in Relation to Quality of Life of Patient With Parkinson’s Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study Neuroticism and Conscientiousness Personality in Relation to QoL of Patient With PD. Frontiers In Neurology.
10. Mousavi, R. (2017). Relationship between Big Five Personality Factors Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Openness, Loyalty and Marital Adjustment. NeuroQuantology. 15(4). 63–68. URL: https://doi.org/10.14704/ nq. 2017