Olga Sannikova. INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF THE EMOTIONAL ACUMEN IN PEOPLE PRONE TO MACHIAVELLIANISM

(2022) Science and education, 4, 57-63. Odessa.

Olga Sannikova,
Doctor of Psychology, Рrofessor,
Head of General and Differential Psychology Department,
The State Institution “South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky”,
4, Fontanska Str., Odesa, Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-2103


INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF THE EMOTIONAL ACUMEN IN PEOPLE PRONE TO MACHIAVELLIANISM


SUMMARY:

The given article is aimed at presenting the results of the research on the individual psychological features of the emotional acumen in people who are characterized by a non-clinical form of Machiavellianism. The urgency of the problem is related to the increase in various psycho-emotional and personal disorders caused by the social and political situation in our country – the war. The concepts of Machiavellianism and emotional acumen are theoretically considered as a complex personality property that provides an accurate, adequate reflection of the emotional world of another person based on the recognition of signals of his expression and behavior. It is clarified that emotional acumen is aimed at recognizing and understanding the feelings of another person in order to ascertain and diagnose the emotional states of others without interfering in their course, without external influence on them, and does not affect the regulation of other people’s emotions and the results of such influence. The author analyzes the structure of emotional acumen, the component composition of its indicators, which includes: intentional, emotional, cognitive, conative (behavioral), reflexive (self-control and regulatory) indicators, etc. Machiavellianism in modern psychology is considered mainly as a person’s tendency to use manipulative tactics to achieve their goals against the background of pragmatic morality and cynicism. The assumption about the presence of individual psychological specificity of emotional acumen in people who differ in manifestations of Machiavellianism was empirically tested. The leading methods of this research are the theoretical and methodological analysis of the literature and the empirical study of the ratio of indicators of selected personality traits, which are relevant to the problem and goal of the study. Significant positive and negative correlations were established between the indicators of emotional acumen (ability to recognize emotions) and indicators of the selected personality type. It has been proved that individuals who are prone to Machiavellianism are characterized by high values of the indicator of intentionality (a focus on recognizing the inner emotional world of other people) and a predictive indicator, based on the cognitive component of emotional acumen against the background of low values of other indicators. Representatives of the group of people with low values of the MAC indicator are characterized by a more «smoothed» profile with a tendency to a high level of all indicators of emotional acumen. It has been empirically proven that the tendency to Machiavellianism is characterized by specific manifestations of indicators of emotional insight and the peculiarities of their combinations (combinations).


KEYWORDS:

personality, emotional acumen, structure, Machiavellianism, manipulation, individual psychological differences.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:


1. Varii, M.Y. (2007). Zahalna psykholohiia [General Psychology]. Kyiv : Tsentr uchbovoi literatury [in Ukrainian].
2. Retrieved from https://thelib.info/logika/2144149-emocionalnaya-pronicatelnost/#google_vignette.
3. Yehorova, M. & Sytnikova, M. (2014). Temna triada [Dark Triad]: [Elektronnyj resurs]. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v7i38.580 [in Ukrainian].
4. Zhen, Chzhun (2020). Rozpiznavannia emotsii inshoho u spivvidnoshenni iz konhruentnistiu [Recognizing another's emotions in relation to congruence]. Osobystis u suchasnomu vymiri. Mater. KhI Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii osobystosti» (m. Odesa, 20 kvitnia 2020 r.). Odesa : FOP Belyi A.Ie. P. 296–303 [in Ukrainian].
5. Ichanska, O.M. & Zakrevska, A.I. (2019). Emotsiinyi intelekt ta empatiia yak resursy profesiinoi pidhotovky studentiv-psykholohiv [Emotional intelligence and empathy as resources for professional training of psychology students]. Molodyi vchenyi, 9 (2), 272–276 [in Ukrainian].
6. Kyrylenko, T.S. (2007). Psykholohiia: emotsiina sfera osobystosti [Psychology: emotional sphere of personality]. Kyiv : Lybid [in Ukrainian].
7. Kiseleva, E.A. (1999). Osobennosti psihologicheskoj pronicatel'nosti u lic s razlichnoj jemocional'noj dispoziciej [Features of psychological insight in persons with different emotional dispositions]: Candidate’s thesis. Odessa [in Ukrainian].
8. Rodzhers, Karl (2017). Hruppovaia psykhoterapyia [Group psychotherapy] : Elektronnyj resurs. Dostup do resursu https://cutt.ly/YVImKtj [in Ukrainian].
9. Sannikova, O.P. (2009). Determinacionnye tendencii jemocional'nosti [Determinative tendencies of emotionality]. Naukovij chasopis NPU іmenі M.P. Dragomanova. Serіja № 12. Psihologіchnі nauki – Scientific journal of the M.P. Drahomanov NPU. Series No. 12. Psychological sciences, 26 (50), І, 114–123 [in Ukrainian].
10. Sannikova, O.P. (2022). Emocijna pronyklyvist" yak predyktor emocijnoho intelektu [Emotional insight as a predictor of emotional intelligence]. Naukovi perspektyvy. Seriya «Psyxolohiya» – Scientific perspectives. «Psychology» series, 9 (27), 357–371. URL: https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2022-9(27)-357-371 [in Ukrainian].
11. Sannikova, O.P. (2017). Psykholohichna pronyklyvist yak instrument osiahnennia sutnosti inshoi liudyny [Psychological insight as a tool for understanding the essence of another person]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Derzhavnoho vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu «Zaporizkyi natsionalnyi universytet» ta Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Zaporizhzhia : ZNU, 2 (10), 19–23 [in Ukrainian].
12. Sannikova, O.P. & Zhen, Chzhun (2021). Emotsiina pronyklyvist v systemi faktornykh rys osobystosti [Emotional insight in the system of factor personality traits]. Naukovi perspektyvy – Scientific perspectives, 12 (18), 482–492 [in Ukrainian].
13. Sannikova, O.P. & Zhen, Chzhun (2020). Osoblyvosti ekspresiyi osib z riznoyu sxyl"nistyu do aleksytymiyi [Peculiarities of expression of persons with different tendencies to alexithymia]. Naukovij chasopis NPU іmenі M.P. Dragomanova. Serіja № 12. Psihologіchnі nauki – Scientific journal of the M.P. Drahomanov NPU. Series No. 12. Psychological sciences, 9 (54), 131–142 [in Ukrainian].
14. Sannikova, O.P. & Makeyeva, E.O. (2020). Faktorna struktura osobystosti makiavellistiv [The factor structure of the Machiavellian personality]. Osobystist u suchasnomu vymiri: Materialy XI Vseukrayinskoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferenciyi «Problemy suchasnoyi psyxolohiyi osobystosti» – Personality in the modern dimension: Materials of the XI All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference «Problems of Modern Personality Psychology» (Odesa, 20 kvitnya 2020 r.). Odesa : FOP Byelyj A.Ye., 222–230 [in Ukrainian].
15. Sannikova, O.P. & Sannikova, A.O. (2014). Stsenichni bariery: dyferentsialno-psykholohichnyi pidkhid [Stage barriers: a differential-psychological approach]. Odesa : VMV [in Ukrainian].
16. Abell, L. & Brewer, G. (2014). Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 258–262.
17. Christie, R. & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press [in England].
18. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W.V. (1975). Unmasking the Face: a Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Expressions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
19. Jones, D.N. & Paulhus, D.L. (2010). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions / L.M. Horowitz, S. Strack (Eds.). New York: Wiley, 249–268.
20. Rauthmann, J.F. (2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3 (4), 487–496.
21. Veselka, L., Cairncross, M. & Vernon, P.A. (2014). A behavioural genetic analysis of Alexithymia and the dark triad traits of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 48.

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.