(2018) Science and education, 7-8, 59-66. Odessa.
DOI:
Volodymyr Lizohub,
Doctor of Biology, professor, Department of Anatomy,
Director of Physiology Research Center named after Mykhailo Bosyi,
Vitalii Pustovalov,
PhD (Candidate of Sciences in Physical Education and Sports), associate professor,
Department of Theory and Methods of Physical Education and Sport Games,
Nataliia Chernenko,
PhD (Candidate of Biological Sciences),
Department of Anatomy,
The Bohdan Khelnytsky National University of Cherkasy,
24, Dashkevycha Str., Cherkasy, Ukraine
IS IT POSSIBLE TO PREDICT ACADEMIC SUCCESS WITH THE HELP OF
MAIN NERVOUS PROCESSES PROPERTIES AND PSYCHIC FUNCTIONS?
SUMMARY:
The article deals with the issue of determining the role of individual-typological properties of the basic nervous processes in academic success and psychic (mental) functions of secondary school students. The following research methods were used in the study: scientific literature review, determination of individual-typological properties of CNS (central nervous system), short-term visual memory and volitional attention; expert assessment of the respondents’ academic success, variation statistics. It has been found that the students with the academic success above average are characterized by better indicators of individual-typological properties of the basic nervous processes and functions of memory and attention. Statistically significant differences of individual-typological properties of the basic nervous processes, attention and memory were detected in groups of the students with different levels of learning performance. The students with above average and average academic success levels were also characterized by high indicators of the typological properties of the basic nervous processes, the volume of short-term visual memory and efficiency of attention in comparison with their peers with a low level. The results of the statistical and correlation analysis have proved that individual-typological properties of the basic nervous processes make up psychophysiological basis of the psychic functions and the success of learning performance of school students. A multiple regression analysis of the complex of psychophysiological indicators of students and their comparison with academic performance helped to predict integral assessment of learning activities, taking into consideration the data about the level of individual-typological properties of CNS, memory and attention. According to the indicators of individual-typological properties, memory and attention it was offered to conduct pedagogical selection of students to classes and educational institutions with increased requirements for studying. Knowledge about the peculiarities of educational activity, taking into consideration the individual-typological properties of the central nervous system provides an opportunity for specialists to predict and correct the pedagogical processing order to increase its efficiency.
KEYWORDS:
academic success, properties of memory and attention, typological properties, functional mobility, power of nervous processes.
FULL TEXT:
REFERENCES:
1. Aleksandrov, A. A. (2010). Psikhogenetika [Psychogenetics]. St. Petersbur: Piter [in Russian].
2. Bekhtereva, N. P. (1974). Neyrofiziologicheskie aspekty psikhicheskoy deyatelnosti [Neurophysiological aspects of mental activity]. Leningrad: Meditsina [in Russian].
3. Holubeva, E. A. (1980). Individualnyie osobennosti pamyati cheloveka [Individual features of human memory]. Psihofiziologicheskie issledovaniya – Psychophysiological studies. Мoscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].
4. Zaporozhets, О. P. (2008). Psihofiziologichni vlastivosti uchniv molodshogo shkilnogo viku z riznimi fizichnim ta rozumovim navantazhennyam [Psychological properties of the pupils of junior school age with different physical and mental stresses]. Extended abstract of doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
5. Ilyin, E. P. (2012). Psihologiya tvorchestva, kreativnosti, odarennosti: monografiya [Psychology of arts, creativity, giftedness]. St. Petersbur: Piter [in Russian].
6. Kalinichenko, І. О. (2016). Optymizatsiia navchalnoho protsesu v starshykh klasakh za danymy konstytutsiino-typolohichnykh ta funktsionalnykh kharakterystyk uchniv [Optimization of the educational process in the senior classes for giving constitutional-typological and functional characteristics of the pupils]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 8, 68-72 [in Ukrainian].
7. Klyuchko, O. I., Sukharev, N. F. (2015). Pedagogicheskaya psihologiya: Ucheb. Posobie [Pedagogical psychology: textbook]. Moscow-Berlin: DirectMedia [in Russian].
8. Kokun, O. M., Savenkov, І. І. (2017). Psihosomaticheskie aspektyi sohraneniya i vosstanovleniya zdorovya lichnosti. [Psychosomatic aspects of preservation and restoration of health of the person]. Zdorove. Lichnost. Obschestvo: sbornik nauchnyih trudov – Health. Personality. Society: a collection of scientific papers, (pp. 63-88) [in Russian].
9. Korobeinikov, G. V., Mishko, V. V., Pastukhova, V. A., Smolyr, I. I. (2017). Kohnityvni funktsii ta uspishnist u formuvanni khoreohrafichnykh navykiv u tantsivnykiv serednoho shkilnoho viku [Cognitive functions and success in the formation of choreographic skills at dancers of middle school age]. Pedahohika, psykholohiia ta medyko-biolohichni problemy fizychnoho vykhovannia i sportu – Pedagogy, psychology and medical-biological problems of physical education and sports, 7, 18-23 [in Ukrainian].
10. Kutsenko, Т. V. (2000). Stan vlastyvostei psykhofiziolohichnykh funktsii u ditei molodshoho shkilnoho viku [The state of properties of psychophysiological functions of the pupils of junior school age]. Extended abstract of doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
11. Lyzohub, V. S., Nechiporenko, L. A., Pustovalov, V. O., Suprunovich V. O. (2016). Spetsialna pidhotovka ta stan bioenerhetyky futbolistiv iz riznymy typolohichnymy vlastyvostiamy vyshchykh viddiliv tsentralnoi nervovoi systemy [Special training and the state of bioenergetics of football players with different typological properties of the higher divisions of the central nervous system]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 8, 107- 112 [in Ukrainian].
12. Makarenko, M. V., Lizohub, V. S. (2011). Ontohenez psykhofiziolohichnykh funktsii liudyny: monohrafiia [Ontogenesis of psychophysiological functions of a person]. Cherkasy: Vertical [in Ukrainian].
13. Maksimenko, S. D., Kravchenko, D. G., Kokun, O. M., Panasenko, N. M. (2015). Psykholohichnyi suprovid yak zasib aktyvizatsii piznavalnoi diialnosti uchniv: metodychnyi posibnyk [Psychological support as a means of activating cognitive activity of students]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
14.Orlova, A. A. (2016). Metodologiya issledovaniya mehanizma otsenivaniya novyih rezultatov obrazovatelnogo protsessa: monografiya [Methodology of the study of the mechanism for evaluating the new results of the educational process]. Moscow-Berlin: DirectMedia [in Russian].
15. Samokish, I. I., Bosenko, A. I., Dichell, G. O. (2016). Optimization of the educational process of physical education in higher educational institutions on the basis of monitoring of students' functional abilities. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 8, 151-157 [in Ukrainian].
16. Kharchenko, D. M. (1998). Stan psykhofiziolohichnykh funktsii u studentiv z riznymy vlastyvostiamy osnovnykh nervovykh protsesiv [State of psychophysiological functions in students with different properties of the main nervous processes]. Extended abstract of doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
17. Chernenko-Kurahina, N. P. (2016). Fiziolohichni kharakterystyky rozumovoi diialnosti liudei z riznymy indyvidualno-typolohichnymy vlastyvostiamy vyshchoi nervovoi diialnosti pry nyzkomu tempi pererobky informatsii [Physiological characteristics of mental activity of people with different individual typological properties of higher nervous activity at a low speed]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu – Cherkasy university bulletin: biological sciences series, 1, 120-126 [in Ukrainian].
18. Feldshtein, D. I. (2015). Psikhologiya sovremennogo podrostka [Psychology of the modern teenager]. Мoscow: Pedagogy [in Russian].
19. Aquino J. M., Arnell K. M. (2007). Attention and the processing of emotional words: Dissociating effects of arousal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 430-435 [in English].
20. Atkinson, C. M., Drysdale, K. A., Fulham, W. R. (2003). Event-related potentials to Stroop and reverse Stroop stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 47 (1), 1-21 [in English].
21. Brechmann, A., Gaschler-Markefski, B., Sohr, M . et al. (2007). Working memory specific activity in auditory cortex: potential correlates of sequential processing and maintenance. Cereb. Cortex., 17 (11), 2544- 2552 [in English].
22. Compton, R. J. (2003). The Interface between Emotion and Attention: A Review of Evidence from Psychology and Neuroscience. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2 (2), 115-129 [in English].
23. Chebykin, O. Ya. (2017). System-Activity Conception of Teachers Training: Competence and Organizational Aspects. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 10, 101-106. [in English].
24. Sternberg, S. (1966). High speedscanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654 [in English].