(2018) Science and education, 5-6, 85-95. Odessa.

Antonina Tokarska,
Doctor of Law, professor,
Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Psychology
National University ‘Lviv Polytechnic’,
Іryna Zharovska,
Doctor of Law, associate professor,
Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Psychology
National University ‘Lviv Polytechnic’,
Іryna Sofinska,
PhD, associate professor,
Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Psychology
National University ‘Lviv Polytechnic’,
1/3, Kn. Romana Str., Lviv, Ukraine

PSYCHOLOGY OF CONFLICT AND SECURING
AN INDIVIDUAL IN COURT PROCEEDINGS

This article is dedicated to psycho-linguo-communicative means of identifying the level and style of conflict behaviour displayed by lawyers, which should be overcome for the sake of securing an individual not just at the stage of listening to litigants, but after completion of the court proceedings. The skills of trial participants to discern psychological intentions by verbal indicators are important. This has been noticed at such problems in the society as social pathology, legal compulsion, anomic, invective remarks in communicative acts. Special features of the mechanisms of aggression manifestation and the markers of its recognition in practice as well as groups (types) of non-aggressive communication have been identified.

psychology of litigants, psycho-diagnostics, conflict communication, invective content, securing an individual, markers, conflict psycho-argumentation/reasoning, conflict-free psycho-argumentation/reasoning.

1. Volkova T. (2017). Ritoricheskiy rechevoy portret publichnoy yasykovoy lichnosti: effektivnost logicheskoy i psichologicheskoy storony argumentatsyy. Nauchnyy zhurnal “Klub HAU” – Scientific journal, 132(08), 1-13 [in Russian].
2. Cassin, B. ta Sogova, K. (2013). Yevropejskyj slovnyk filosofij. Leksykon neperekladnostej. Kyiv: “Dukh i litera” [in Ukrainian].
3. Karachanyan S. (2013). Teoriya argumentatsyy i problema ubezgdeniya v sude. Izvetiya MGTU “MAMN” – News of MGTU “MAMN”, 4(18), 292-298 [in Russian].
4. Laponov M., Komissarov V. (2015). Filosofija jak nauka. Osnovy filosofskoji metodolohiji [Philosophy as science. Bases of philosophic methods]. Systema suchasnych metodolohij – System of moders methods, 1, 200-222 [in Ukrainian].
5. Yasynok, M.M., Yasynok, D.M. (2017). Psycholohij sudovoho protsesu: psycholoho-pravovyj aspekt: nauk.-prakt. Posibnyk [Physochogy of court: psycho-legal aspect”: textbook] [in Ukrainian].
6. Tokarska, A.S. (2005). Komunikatsiya u pravi ta pravookhoronniy dijalnosti [Communication in law and legal activities]. Lviv: Lviv. juryd. In-t MVS Ukrajiny [in Ukrainian].
7. Shevandrin, N.I. (1999). Psichdiagnostika, korreksiya i razvitiye lichnosti [Psychodiagnostics, correction and development of personality]. Moscow: Humanit. izd. tsentr. “VLADOS” [in Russian].
8. Shulha, L. V. (2012). Teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty zakhysnoi promovy yak zasoby psykholohichnoho vplyvu v umovakh sudovykh debativ [Theoretical and practical aspects of a protective speech as a means of psychological influence in the context of court debates]. Pravnychyi visnyk Universytetu «KROK» - The Legal Bulletin of the University "KROK", 13, 263- 266. [in Ukrainian].
9. Alberstein, M. (2015). Judicial Conflict Resolution (JCR): A New Jurisprudence for an Emerging Judicial Practice. Cardozo Law Journal of Conflict Resolution.16. URL: www.ssrn.com/abstract=2629814
10. Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J. S. (1964) The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
11. Carmen, E. (2009). Pavel Normative Conflict in International Law. San Diego law review. 46. pp. 883- 907. URL: www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp
12. Carneiro, R. L. (1981) Herbert Spencer as an Anthropologist. The Journal of Libertarian Studies.V, No.2. pp. 153-210. URL: www.mises.org/sites/default/files/5_2_2_0.pdf
13. Collins, P. M., & Solowiej, Jr. and L. A. (2007). Competition, and Conflict in the U.S. Supreme Court Law Social Inquiry. 32 (4), pp. 955–984. doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00084.x
14. Dyrda, A., Ghazal, N., Nowak, R., Pogorzelski, A. & Samonek, A. (2010). Teoria i filosofia prawa. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
15. Fessas, A. G. (2016). Ethics and conflicts of interests: the ICC court perspective CIArb/ Dispute Appointment Service Convention URL: www.source/ciarbdocuments/events/2016/december/dasconvention-presentations/alexander-fessas.pdf?sfvrsn=2
16. Kelman, H. C. (2010). Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation: A Social-Psychological Perspective on Ending Violent Conflict Between Identity Groups. Landscapes of Violence. 1(1), Article 5, pp. 5-9.
17. Kojder, A. & Cyiwiński, Z. (2014). Socjologia prawa. Glówne problemy i postacie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
18. Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996). The Trouble with the Adversary System in a Postmodern, Multicultural World. William and Mary Law Review 38(3). pp. 5-44. URL: www.scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol38/iss1/3
19. Paunio, E. (2010). Conflict, power, and understanding - judicial dialogue between the ECJ and national courts. No foundations : journal of extreme legal positivism. 1. 5-24. URL: www.tuhat.helsinki.fi
20. Robert, A. Mittelstaedt & Brian, J. (2012). Who Should Do the Oral Argument? Published in Litigation. 38(4), pp. 1-7. URL: www.jonesday.com/files/Publication/
21. Singer, J.W.(2014). Property Law Conflicts. Washburn Law Journal.54. pp. 129-160. URL: www.scholar.harvard.edu/files/jsinger/files/plc.pdf
22. Thomas K.W.& Kilmann R.H.(2010) Conflict Mode Instrument and Interpretive Report. Report prepared for PAT SAMPLE, 11. URL: www.skillsone.com/Pdfs/smp248248.pdf.
23. Еrvasti, K. (2007). Conflicts before the courts and court-annexed mediation in Finland. Scandinavian Studies in Law.51. pp. 186-200. Retrieved from: www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/51-8.pdf.