(2018) Science and education, 3, 92-98. Odessa.
DOI:
Olena Dziubenko,
PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences), associate professor,
Department of Psychology and Pedagogy,
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University,
9, Pyrohova Str., Kyiv, Ukraine
GENDER BASED DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ IDEAS
OF FAMILY LIFE FROM FULL AND DIVORCED FAMILIES
SUMMARY:
Modern socio-economic situation in Ukraine is in the process of dynamic changes, that has a significant impact on all spheres of citizens’ lives. Social circumstances complicate Ukrainian family life, lead to the formation of new notions and values. In recent years, the amount of divorces has increased and the birth rate has decreased. Young people of marriageable age do not will to create families. The mentioned problems are relevant and need practical solution. The paper aims to study gender based differences in young people’s views concerning family life depending on the type of their families (full or divorced). On the basis of theoretical and empirical methods of research, there was identified the adverse influence of parents’ divorce on their child’s personality as a future family man. The study involved 50 respondents of both genders from full and divorced families (25 subjects each). The majority of the respondents, whose parents have divorced, as compared to those who are brought up by both parents, have immature ideas and guidelines of family life. It is worth mentioning that predominantly young people from divorced families have light-minded attitude to marriage. The boys have too high expectations about their future wives, insist on the necessity of autonomy in marriage, have light-minded attitude to the formation of family budget, have immature vision of future parenthood. The girls from divorced families, as compared to the boys, have more flexible ideas of family role structure. They are focused on responsibility, shared activity of the married couple and have more conscious attitude to the parenthood. Therefore, young people brought up in divorced families need the correction of their marriage-family vision and especially it concerns young men.
KEYWORDS:
divorce, the image of family life, guidelines, values, adolescence, gender based differences.
FULL TEXT:
REFERENCES:
1. Voitsiakh, T.V. (2012). Innovatsiini metodyky diahnostychnoi roboty z sim’ieiu: spetskurs [Innovative methods of diagnostic work with the family: a special course]. Cherkasy: OIPOPP [in Ukrainian].
2. Hankevych, O.V. (2014). Vplyv dozvillia na zadovolenist podruzhnim zhyttiam [The impact of leisure on satisfaction with married life]. Nauka i osvita - Science and education, 14, 89-93 [in Ukrainian].
3. Krupnyk, I.R. (2013). Batkivska model rodyny v aspekti yii vplyvu na formuvannia uiavlen pro maibutnie simeine zhyttia [Parent model of the family in terms of its influence on the formation of ideas about the future of family life]. Ukrainskyi naukovyi zhurnal «Osvita rehionu. Politolohiia. Psykholohiia. Komunikatsii» - Ukrainian scientific magazine "Education of the region. Politology. Psychology. Communications, 3, 212 [in Ukrainian].
4. Mazuryk, I.O. (2013). Genderni osoblyvosti rolovykh ochikuvan molodi stosovno maibutnoho partnera u shliubi molodi [Gender features of the role expectations of young people in relation to the future partner in marriage to young people]. Elektronnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats Zaporizkoho oblasnoho instytutu pisliadyplomnoi osvity - Electronic collection of scientific works of the Zaporizhzhya Regional Institute of Postgraduate Education, 1(11). Retrieved from http://virtkafedra.ucoz.ua/el_gurnal/pages/vyp11/1/Mazur ik.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Samotaieva, E.O. (2012). Uiavlennia molodi pro simeine zhyttia v rakursi problemy pidhotovky do shliubu [Representation of young people about family life in terms of the problem of preparation for marriage]. Humanitarnyi visnyk - Humanitarian Herald,25, 449–453 [in Ukrainian].
6. Sydorenko, A.V. (2012). Strukturni komponenty psykholohichnoi hotovnosti molodi do simeinykh stosunkiv [Structural components of youth psychological readiness for family relationships]. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii - Theoretical and applied problems of psychology, 1(30), 343–349 [in Ukrainian].
7. Chkhaidze, A.O. (2013). Vzaiemozv’iazok osobystisnoi zrilosti z motyvatsiieiu stvorennia shliubu [Relationship of personality maturity with the motivation of marriage]. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii - Theoretical and applied problems of psychology, 3(32), 298–302 [in Ukrainian].
8. Berlin, G. (2004). The Effects of Marriage and Divorce on Families and Children [Electronic resource] // MDRC, May 13, 2-11. - Mode of access: https://www.mdrc.org/publication/effects-marriage-anddivorce-families-and-children [in English].
9. Rostowska Т. & Spryszyńska, М. (2014). Shlyub i funktsionuvannya sim'yi [Mariage and Family Functioning]. Roczniki Pedagogiczne, 6 (42), 3, 29-51 [in Polish].