(2018) Science and education, 2, 153-160. Odessa.

Inna Yashchuk,
Doctor of Pedagogy, professor,
Dean of the Faculty of Primary Education and Philology,
Khmelnytskyi Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy,
Kateryna Binytska,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), associate professor,
Department of Pedagogy,
Khmelnytskyi Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy,
139, Proskurivskoho Pidpillia Str., Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine,
Iryna Kuzma,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), associate professor,
Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Primary and Preschool Education,
Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University,
2, Maksyma Kryvonosa Str., Ternopil, Ukraine

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FUTURE PRIMARY
SCHOOL TEACHERS TRAINING IN ROMANIA AND HUNGARY

The paper aims to present the results of a comparative analysis of the systems of future primary school teachers training in Hungary and Romania. It has been found that, in Romania and Hungary, the level structure of higher education is used according to the Bologna system; however, in Hungary, there are two models of future teacher training: a vertical model is used in the universities of the country, according to which students receive a qualification of a preschool or primary school teacher based on Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees; and a horizontal model, according to which professional competences are acquired by future primary school teachers at colleges (Bachelor's degree). The achievements of the Romanian and Hungarian pedagogical experience have been highlighted, which can be used to modernize the process of future primary school teachers professional training in Ukraine, namely: increasing the number of psychological and pedagogical disciplines with specification of professional focus for the primary education field; the introduction of a “Teacher of Primary Education” qualification in the domestic system of pedagogical education providing students with professional competencies of a preschool teacher; a teacher of 1-4 grades of primary school, a foreign language teacher in 1-4 grades of primary school and 5-9 grades of secondary schools in bachelor’s and Master’s programs with the possibility of choosing an additional specialization.

professional training, future teachers, primary education, Romania and Hungary.

1. Hodlevska, K. V. (2017). Profesiina pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv pochatkovykh klasiv. u koledzhakh ta universytetakh Uhorshchyny [Professional training of future primary school teachers in colleges and universities of Hungary] Саndidate's thesis. Kyiv: NAPNU [in Ukrainian].
2. Diakova, T. A. (2015). Vуsshee obrazovanye v Venhryy [higher education in Hungary]. Vestnyk VHU Seryia: Problemу vуssheho obrazovanyia – Bulletin of VSU: challenges of higher education, 1, 111–114 [in Russian].
3. Oliinyk, M. I. (2016). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady pidghotovky maibutnikh fakhivciv doshkilnoi osvity v krainakh Skhidnoi Yevropy [Theoretical-methodical bases of training of the future specialists of pre-school education in Eastern Europe). Doctor’s thesis. Ternopil [in Ukrainian].
4. Prysiazhniuk, O.P.(2017). Analiz orhanizatsii movnoi osvity v universytetakh Polshchi ta Ukrainy [Comparative analysis of language education organization at universities in Poland and Ukraine]. Science and education, 12, 135-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-12-19. Retrieved from: http://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/doc/2017/12_2017/19.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Symonenko, S. M., AbdAlBari, A. D. (2011). Porivnialnyi analiz osoblyvostei vizualizatsii suchasnoi kartyny svitu studentskoi molodi Ukrainy ta Iraku [Comparative analysis of features of visualization of modern pictures of the world of studental youth of Ukraine and Iraq]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 1, 81-86. Retrieved from: http://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/doc/2011/1_2011/22.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. 4/2013. (I. 11.) EMMI rendelet a két tanítási nyelvű iskolai oktatás irányelvének kiadásáról. Retrieved from: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=A1300004.EMM. [in Hungarian]
7. 50/2008. (III. 14.) Korm. rendeleta felső oktatási intézmények képzési, tudományos célú ésfenntartói normatíva alapján történő finanszírozásáról. Retrieved from: http://cdn.felvi.hu/bin/content/dload/jogszabalyok/50_2008_intezmenyek_normativa_alapjan_finanszirozasarol_20090501.pdf. [in Hungarian]
8. Barakonyi, K. (2003). The modernization trap. Bologna declaration of basic ideas, the academic work to do. Hungarian Higher Education. (Vol. 1–3), (pp. 27–30). [in English].
9. Cucoş, C. (2014). Pedagogie Editia a ІІІrevăzută şiadaugată. Iasi : Polirom. [in Romanian].
10. Dinya, L. (2002). The «Bologna process» in the dual training system perspective II. Hungarian Higher Education. Vol. 8. (pр. 22–25). [in English].
11. Klochkova, T. I., Sbruieva, A. A., Pshenychna, L. V. (2017). Risk Management in The Activities of a Modern University: a Comparative Analysis of British and Ukrainian Experience. Science and education, 10, 13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-10-2. Retrieved from: http://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/doc/2017/10_2017/2.pdf [in English].
12. Mózes, M. (2002). The introduction of the two-level teacher training mission. The Bologna Declaration and the Hungarian higher education. Hungarian Accreditation Committee. Budapest. (рр. 78–82). [in English].
13. Ordinance of Ministry of Education No. 15/2006. (IV. 3.) on The undergraduate and graduate degree programs for training and outcome requirements. Hungarian Gazette, 153(I), 12042–12102. [in English].
14. Salamucha, A. (2004). Definicje wychowania w literaturze pedagogicznej. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych. KUL, Z. 2. (s. 31–43) [in Polish].
15. Schifirnet, C. (1997). Changing Adults’ Education. Bucharest, Fiat Lux Printing House. [in English].
16. Szabó, L. T. (1996) Európai dimenziók a tanárképzésben. Euroharmonizáció. Oktatáskutató Kiadója, Educatio. 5.évf. 4. Budapest. (рр.596-60) [in Hungarian].
17. The Bologna Reform of Teacher Education in Ukraine and Hungary: A Comparative Analysis. Retrieved from: http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/1/11/12/index.html. [in English]
18. The Teaching Profession in Europe Practices, Perceptions, and Policies Eurydice Report. Retrieved from: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/the matic_reports/184EN.pdf [in English]
19. Tünde, B. A tanitokepzes rendszere magyarorszagon es romaniaban Nehany szerkezeti es tartami komponens osszehasonlito vizsgalata. Retrieved from: http://www.magyarpedagogia.hu/document/2002_2_4_439_ Barabasi.pdf [in Hungarian]
20. Velea, S. O. (2011). Istrate Teacher Education in Romania European dimensions of teacher education : similarities and differences. Ljubljana : Faculty of Education ; Kranj : The National School of Leadership and Education. (рр.271–295). [in English].