Nataliia Karhina. Factors of Personality’s Psychological Well-Being.

(2018) Science and education, 1, 83-87. Odessa.


DOI:

Nataliia Karhina,
post-graduate student, Department of General and Differential Psychology,
South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky,
4, Fontanska Doroha Str., Odesa, Ukraine


FACTORS OF PERSONALITY’S PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING


SUMMARY:

The paper presents a fragment of the empirical study of factors of personality’s psychological well-being concerning the consideration of this phenomenon in the system of psychological phenomena by using multiple regression analysis. It has been found that among the factors of psychological well-being the leading ones are fatalistic present, reflexivity, happiness, self-efficacy, subjective vitality, intelligence, suspicion, self-understanding, consciousness, radicalism, satisfaction with life, involvement, responsibility, and comprehension.


KEYWORDS:

well-being, psychological well-being, personality, factors of psychological well-being.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Bandura, A. (2000). Teoriya sotsialnogo naucheniya [Theory of Social Science]. Saint Petersburg: Eurasia [in Russian].
2. Baturin, N.A. (2013). Teoreticheskaya model lichnostnogo blagopoluchiya [The Theoretical Model of Personal Well-being]. Vestnik YuUrGU – The Bulletin of the YuUrGU, 4, 4-14 [in Russian].
3. Dubrovina, I.V. (2000). Psihicheskoe zdorove detey i podrostkov v kontekste psihologicheskoy sluzhbyi [Mental health of children and adolescents in the context of psychological service]. 4th ed. Yekaterinburg: Business Book [in Russian].
4. Idobayeva, O.A. (2013). Psihologopedagogicheskaya model formirovaniya psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya lichnosti [Psychologicalpedagogical model of the formation of psychological well-being of the individual]. Extended abstract of doctor’s thesis [in Russian].
5. Nasledov, A.D. (2006). Matematicheskie metodyi psihologicheskogo issledovaniya. Analiz i interpretatsiya dannyih [Mathematical methods of psychological research. Analysis and interpretation of data]. Saint Petersburg: Rech [in Russian].
6. Perlz, F., Hefferlin, R., Goodman, P. (1993). Opyityi psihologii samosoznaniya [Experiments in the Psychology of Self-Consciousness]. Moscow: Science [in Russian].
7. Syrtsova, A. (2008). Opyityi psihologii samosoznaniya [Age dynamics of the temporal perspective of the person]. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
8. Shevelenkova, T. D. (2005). Psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti [Psychological well-being of the person]. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika –Psychological diagnostics, 3, 95-121 [in Russian].
9. Abdalina, L. V., Zhigulin, A.A., Ryabysheva, E.N. (2011). An overview of acmeological potential of an individual. Perspektivy nauki – Prospects of science, 5 (20), 239-242. [in English].
10. Antonovsky, A. (1986). Pathogenesis and Salutogenesis in War and Other Crises: Who Studies the Successful Coper? Stress and coping in time of war: generalizations from the Israeli experience. New York: Brunner/Mazel [in English].
11. Bailey, T., Eng, W., Frisch, M., Snyder, C. R. (2007). Hope and optimism as related to life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology. Vol. 2(3). pp. 168-169. [in English].
12. Bradburn, N. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Chicago [in English].
13. Maddi, S., et. al. (2006). The Personality Construct of Hardiness III: Relationships with Repression, Innovativeness, Authoritarianism and Performance. Journal of Personality, 32, 575–598 [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.