Svitlana Khilko. Study of Future Psychologists’ Tolerance to Uncertainty Maturity.

(2017) Science and education, 9, 59-67. Odessa.


DOI:

Svitlana Khilko,
senior lecturer, Department of Psychology and Personal Development,
post-graduate student,
University of Education Management of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine,
52-a, Sichovykh Striltsiv Str., Kyiv, Ukraine


STUDY OF FUTURE PSYCHOLOGISTS’
TOLERANCE TO UNCERTAINTY MATURITY


SUMMARY:

The article deals with the results of the preliminary stage of the experiment aimed at examining the maturity of tolerance to uncertainty in future psychologists. The purpose of the study is to determine the levels of tolerance to uncertainty in future psychologists, which consists of the following components: cognitive, affective, and conative. The experiment involved 282 respondents – students of psychological faculties of higher educational institutions, which, with a view to identifying socio-psychological factors in the formation of tolerance to uncertainty, were divided into groups according to gender, age, level of education, course of study, form of study, work experience, desire to work as a psychologist. The following research methods were used in the empirical study: a questionnaire for identifying future psychologists’ awareness of tolerance to uncertainty (author’s development), a method for diagnosing the level of reflexivity maturity, the method of “Personal Readiness for Changes”, a method for diagnosing the level of empathic abilities, Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire for, “Personal Factors of Decision-Making” questionnaire, a questionnaire of tolerance to uncertainty, the method “Tolerance to uncertainty”, statistical mathematical methods for processing data using the computer program SPSS (version 17.0). As a result of the study it has been found that most of future psychologists have low and moderate levels of maturity of cognitive, affective and conative components of tolerance to uncertainty. The developed methodological basis for the study of the formation of tolerance to uncertainty of future psychologists, consisting of cognitive, affective and conative components deepens the knowledge of the components of tolerance to uncertainty, which will be used in the program for forming tolerance to uncertainty in future psychologists.


KEYWORDS:

tolerance to uncertainty, intolerance to uncertainty, interpersonal intolerance to uncertainty, coping strategy, future psychologists.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Bergis, T. A. (2015). Gotovnost lichnosti k peremenam i tolerantnost k neopredelennosti na etape ranney vzroslosti [Readiness of the person for changes and tolerance to uncertainty at the stage of early adolescence]. Vektor nauki TGU – Vector science of TSU, 4, 38-42. Saint Petersburg [in Russian].
2. Briukhovetska, O. V. (2015). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti tolerantnosti do nevyznachenosti v upravlinskii diialnosti yak odniiei zi skladovykh profesiinoi tolerantnosti kerivnykiv zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [Psychological peculiarities of tolerance to uncertainty in management activity as one of the components of professional tolerance of heads of general educational institutions]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii – Problems of modern psychology, 27, 700-81 [in Ukrainian].
3. Gusev, A. I. (2011). Tolerantnost k neopredelennosti kak sostavlyayuschaya lichnostnogo potentsiala [Tolerance to uncertainty as a component of the personal potential]. Lichnostnyiy potentsial: struktura i diagnostika – Personal Potential: Structure and Diagnostics (pp. 300- 329). Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].
4. Karpov, A. V. (2003). Refleksivnost kak psihologicheskoe svoystvo i metodika ee diagnostiki [Reflexivity as a psychological property and a method of its diagnostics]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 5, 45-57 [in Russian].
5. Kornilova, T. V. (2013). Melburnskiy oprosnik prinyatiya resheniy: russkoyazyichnaya adaptatsiya [Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire: Russianlanguage Adaptation]. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya – Psychological research, 31, 4. Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2013v6n31/883- kornilova31.html [in Russian].
6. Kornilova, T. V. (2010). Printsip neopredelennosti: yedinstvo intellektualno-lichnostnogo potentsiala cheloveka [Principle of uncertainty: unity of intellectual and personal potential of a person]. Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].
7. Kornilova, T. V. (2015). Risk i prinyatie resheniy: psihologiya neopredelennosti: monogr. [Risk and decision-making: uncertainty psychology: monogr.]. Moscow [in Russian].
8. Leonov, I. N. (2015). Vliyanie tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti na professionalno vazhnyie kachestva rukovoditelya [Influence of tolerance to uncertainty on professional qualities of the head]. Candidate’s thesis. Udmurtiya [in Russian].
9. Lushin, P. V. (2005). Lichnostnyie izmeneniya kak protsess: teoriya i praktika: monogr. [Personality changes as a process: theory and practice: monogr.]. Odessa: Aspekt [in Russian].
10. Lushin, P. V. (2017). Haos i nepredelennost: ot stradaniya k rostu i razvitiyu: monogr [Chaos and uncertainty: from suffering to growth and development: monogr.]. Kiev [in Russian].
11. Nosenko, E. (2002). Tolerantnist do nevyznachenosti yak systemoutvoriuvalnyi osobystisnyi chynnyk tvorchoi obdarovanosti [Tolerance to uncertainty as a system-forming personality factor of creative talent]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and Society, 1, 97- 106 [in Ukrainian].
12. Perehonchuk, N. V. (2016). Sytuatsiia nevyznachenosti perekhidnoho periodu rozvytku suspilstva yak psykholohichna umova formuvannia profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnoho psykholoha [The situation of uncertainty of the transition period of society development as a psychological condition for the formation of the professional competence of the future psychologist]. ScienceRise, 3/1, 41-45 [in Ukrainian].
13. Pochebut, L. G. (2012). Kross-kulturnaya i etnicheskaya psihologiya: ucheb. posob. [Cross-cultural and ethnic psychology: textbook]. Saint Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
14. Soldatova, G. U., Shaygerova, L. A. (2003). Praktikum po psihodiagnostike i issledovaniyu tolerantnosti lichnosti [Practicum on psychodiagnostics and research of personality tolerance]. Moscow: MGU [in Russian].
15. Raygorodskiy, D. Ya. (2001). Prakticheskaya psihodiagnostika. Metodiki i testyi: ucheb. posob. [Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests: study. guide]. Samara [in Russian].
16. Solntseva, G. N. (2009). Prinyatie resheniy v situatsii neopredelennosti i riska [Making decisions in situations of uncertainty and risk]. Moscow: Trudyi ISA RAN [in Russian].
17. Solomina, H. V. (2011). Tolerantnist do nevyznachenosti yak pokaznyk kohnityvnoho styliu kerivnykiv zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu [Tolerance to uncertainty as an indicator of the cognitive style of the heads of a comprehensive educational institution]. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni T. H. Shevchenka – Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Chernigiv National Pedagogical University, 84, 47-51 [in Ukrainian].
18. Bayer, S. (2007). The Relationship Between Basic Assumptions, Posttraumatic Growth, and Ambiguity Tolerance in an Israeli Sample of Young Adults: A Mediation-Moderation Model. Traumatology, 13, 4-15 [in English].
19. Evans, D. (2012). Risk intelligence. How to live with uncertainty. New York: Free press [in English].
20. Stoycheva, K. (2010). Tolerance for ambiguity, creativity, and personality. Bulgarian Journal of Psychology (SEERCP 2009 Conference Papers, Part Two), 4, 178-188 [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2020 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.