(2017) Science and education, 8, 39-43. Odessa.

Wadim Strielkowski,
Doctor of Economic Sciences, professor,
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,
University of California, Berkeley and Prague Business School,
CA 94720, Berkeley, United States,
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Inna Gryshova,
Doctor of Economic Sciences, professor,
Centre for Scientometrics Research, Prague Business School,
Werichova 29, 152 00 Prague, Czech Republic,
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Maryna Shcherbata,
PhD (Candidate of Economic Sciences),
assistant professor Economics and International Economic Relations,
The International University for the Humanities,
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

PREDATORY PUBLISHING AND BEALL’S LIST: LESSONS FOR THE
COUNTRIES ADAPTING NOVEL RESEARCH EVALUATION CRITERIA

Academic publishing is important both for academics and research and educational institutions, since it plays a significant role in institutional evaluation and rankings. In most countries, the desirable academic output represents publications in journals indexed in Scopus and Web of Science databases. However, even some of these journals were included in the so-called “Beall’s List”, a blog that claimed to feature the list of open-access “predatory” journals (i.e. journals publishing scientific nonsense for money). Czech Republic was one of the Eastern European countries that was severely affected by this phenomenon. According to some estimates, between 2009 and 2013 many Czech universities and research institutions made about 2 million USD on payments from the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport for the papers and monographs published by the “predatory” publishers. Even though Scopus and Web of Science remain the main criterion for journals selection in the Czech Republic, some critics try to undermine the prestige of these databases. However, it become obvious that drifting away from Scopus and Web of Sciencein order to create local publication standards might lead to a situation in which a small group of local academics would make decisions on which articles (and which journals) are good and which are bad, and therefore control academic careers and job promotions for their own benefit.

academic publishing, Scientometrics, predatory journals, Bealls’s List, Scopus, Web of Science

1. Beall, J. (2015). Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures. Information Development, 31(5), 473-476. doi:10.1177/0266666915601421.
2. Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415): 179. doi:10.1038/489179a
3. Grancay, M., Vveinhardt, J., Sumilo, E. (2007). Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015. Scientometrics, (3), 1813-1837. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2332-z
4. Beall, J. (2017). What I learnedfrompredatorypublishers. Biochemiamedica: BiochemiaMedica, 27(2), 273-278. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029
5. Vědažije (2016). Vysokéškolyčerpalyprostředky z MŠMT zadiplomovéprácepřetištěnéjakoodbornéknihy (Universities received money from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport for diploma theses printed as scientific monographs). Available at: http://vedazije.cz/node/5101. Accessed on: 30.09.2017
6. Stöckelová, T. (2016). Sociological imagination for Future ESA Conferences. Sociologickycasopis-Czech Sociological Review. 2016. 52(3): 403-404
7. Smutný, Z., Řezníček, V. (2015). Predatory Open Access Publishers and other Dangers to Today’s Scientific Community. Acta InformaticaPragensia. 4(2), 182-200. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.69
8. Gryshova, I.Yu., Zamlynskyi, V.A., Shestakovska, T. L. (2017). Implementing Cluster Forms Into National Education Development Strategy. Science and education, 5, 56-61.