(2017) Science and education, 7, 21-31. Odessa.

Oleksii Chebykin,
Doctor of Psychology, professor,
head of the Department of Theory and Methods of Practical Psychology,
Olena Kosianova,
PhD (Candidate of psychological Sciences), lecturer of the Department of
Theory and Methods of Practical Psychology,
South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odessa, Ukraine

DECEITFULNESS ACCORDING TO THE INDICATORS OF EMOTIONAL
MATURITY METHODOLOGY AND POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION

There has been developed a theoretical model of the polygraph research which consists of three groups of categories and concepts used in the organization, obtaining results and data interpretation: physiological characterizing the logics of these processes; psychological reflecting essential properties and relationships; instrumental-technical describing the polygraph method specificity. There has been created the polygraph questionnaire aimed at diagnosing deceitfulness that allows to identify and analyze indicators characterizing predisposition to verbal, concealed and general deception. The surveyed sample have been grouped according to: gender (men, women); areas of specialists’ training (psychology, history, physics, navigation, fine art); the degree of deceitfulness (high, medium, low); the type of emotional maturity (empathic, self-regulating, expressive, expressive-empathic). Summarizing the correlation analysis data concerning the general sample, it has been found that the integrative parameter of deceitfulness has the greatest number of correlations and is rather closely related to the indicators determining emotional maturity and its components: emotional expressiveness, emotional self-regulation and empathy. The intergroup factor analysis in the groups with different levels of predisposition to general deception has proved that, depending on the level of deceitfulness, there are changes in the dominance of any given components of emotional maturity. A thorough analysis has shown that there are significant interrelations between the indicators of deceitfulness and emotional maturity in the structure of the empathic type that may indicate high probabilistic deceitfulness. In general, the obtained results confirm our hypothesis stating that personality deceitfulness can be determined by the characteristics of emotional maturity, the main of which is the empathic constituent (according to the results of our study).

polygraph examination, types of emotional maturity, deceitfulness, diagnostics of personality deceitfulness based on the data of emotional maturity

1. Alekseyev, L. (2011). Psikhofiziologiya detektsii lzhi: Metodologiya [Psychophysiology of lie detection: Methodology]. Moscow: OOO “Galleya-print” [in Russian].
2. Baryshpolets, O. T. (2013). Brekhnya v informatsiynomu prostori ta mizhosoboviy komunikatsiyi: monohrafiya [Lying in the information space and interpersonal communication: a monograph]. Kirovohrad: Imeks-LTD [in Ukrainian].
3. Varlamov, V. A. (2004). Detektor lzhi [Lie detector]. Krasnodar [in Russian].
4. Vihman, A.A. (2010). Nekotoryye osobennosti individualnosti lzhetsov yunosheskogo vozrasta [Some peculiarities of adolescent liars’ personality] Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal – Syberian Pedagogical Journal [in Russian].
5. Helgorn, E. & Loufborrow, G. (1966). Emotsii i emotsionalnyye rasstroystva. Neyrofiziologicheskoye issledovaniye [Emotions and emotional disorders. Neurophysiological research]. Moscow: Mir [in Russian].
6. Dubrovskiy, D.I. (2010). Obman. Filosofskopsikhologicheskiy analiz [Deception. Philosophicalpsychological analysis]. 2nd ed. rev. Moscow: Kanon + ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” [in Russian].
7. Zhdanova, O.O. (1998). Psikhologicheskiye osobennosti ponimaniya lzhi. Tekst [Psychological features of understanding the lie. Text]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda – Bulletin of Russian Humanitarian Scientific Foundation, 4, 183-189 [in Russian].
8. Zhurin, S. I. & Aliushin, M. V. (2003). Obzor sovremennykh poligrafov [Overview of modern polygraphs]. Mir i bezopasnost – Peace and safety, 2 [in Russian].
9. Znakov, V. V. (1999). Zapadnyye i russkiye traditsii v ponimanii lzhi: razmyshleniya russkogo psikhologa nad issledovaniyami Polya Ekmana [Western and Russian traditions in understanding the lie: Russian psychologist’s reflections on Paul Ekman’s studies]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
10. Izard, K. Ye. (2000). Psikhologiya emotsiy [Psychology of emotions]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
11. Ilyin, Ye.P. (2013). Psikhologiya obshcheniya i mezhlichnostnyh otnosheniy [Psychology of communication and interpersonal relations]. SaintPetersburg: Piter [in Russian].
12. Kniazev, V. & Varlamov, G. (2012). Poligraf i yego prakticheskoye primeneniye: ucheb. posobiye [Polygraph and its practical application: Textbook]. Moscow: “Print-Tsentr” [in Russian].
13. Kocharian, O. S. & Piven, M. A. (2012). Emotsiyna zrilist osobystosti: doslidzhennya fenomenu [Personality emotional maturity: the phenomenon study]. Naukovyi visnyk Mykolayivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni V.O.Sukhomlynskoho: zbirnyk naukovyh prats – Scientific Bulletin of Mykolayiv State University named after Sukhomlynskyi: collection of scientific works, 9, (Vol. 2), 140-144 [in Ukrainian].
14. Lesli, I. (2012). Prirozhdennyye lzhetsy. My ne mozhem zhit bez obmana [Inborn liars. We can not live without deception]. Moscow: Ripol Klassik [in Russian].
15. Luriya, A.R. (2002). Priroda chelovecheskih konfliktov: Obyektivnoye izucheniye dezorganizatsii povedeniya cheloveka [The nature of human conflicts: An objective study of human behaviour disorganization]. Moscow: “Kogito-Tsentr” [in Russian].
16. Maksymenko, S.D. (2007). Psykholohiia osobystosti: pidruchnyk [Personality psychology: textbook]. Kyiv: TOV “KMM” [in Ukrainian].
17. Motliah, O.I. (2012). Polihraf: naukova pryroda pohodzhennia, normatyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia ta dopustymi mezhi zastosuvannia: monohrafiia [Polygraph: scientific nature of origin, normative-legal regulation and permissible limits of implementaion: monograph]. Kyiv: Osvita Ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].
18. Nikitina, Ye. V. (2008). Lozh i obman: problema ponyatiynogo razgranicheniya [Lying and deception: the problem of conceptual delineation]. Psikhologicheskoye obespecheniye natsionalnyh proektov razvitiya obshchestva: opyt, innovatsionnyye tekhnologiyi, mentalnyye baryery: materialy mezhduradnogo kongressa – Psychological support of national projects of society development: experience, innovative technologies, mental barriers: materials of the international congress (pp. 275- 277). Moscow; Kostroma: KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova [in Russian].
19. Nikititna, Ye. V. (2002). Teoreticheskiye aspekty fenomena lzhi [Theoretical aspects of the phenomenon of lying]. Sotsialnaya psikholohiya XXI stoletiya – Social psychology of 21st century (pp. 274–276). Yaroslavl, [in Russian].
20. Orlov, Yu. K. & Holodnyi Yu. I. (2009). Sudebno-psikhofiziologicheskaya ekspertiza s primeneniyem poligrafa: problema dopustimosti [Forensic psycho-physiological expertise using a polygraph: the problem of admissibility]. Vestnik Akademii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti MVD Rossii – Bulletin of Academy of Economic Security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 12, 83–88 [in Russian].
21. Pavlov, I.P. (2001). Refleks svobody [Freedom reflex]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
22. Pelenitsyn, A.B., Soshnikov, A.P. & Zhbankova, O.V. (2011). Tak chto zhe vsyo-taki opredeliayet poligraf? [So what does the polygraph determine?]. Vestnik kriminalistiki – Bulletin of Forensic Science, 2(3), 7-18 [in Russian].
23. Popovichev, S.V. (2011). Legko solgat tyazhelo. Instrumentalnaya detektsiya lzhi: ot ideologii k tekhnologii [It’s difficult to lie easily. Instrumental detection of lie: from ideology to technology]. Moscow [in Russian].
24. Simonov, P.V. (1981). Emotsionalnyi mozg [Emotional brain]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
25. Fry, O. (2006). Lozh. Tri sposoba vyyavleniya. Kak chitat mysli lzhetsa, kak obmanut detektor lzhi [Lying. Three ways to detect. How to read liars’ thoughts, how to deceive the lie detector]. Saint-Petersburg: PraimYevroznak.
26. Kholodnyi, Yu.I. (2013). O “edinom nauchnometodicheskom podhode” k primeneniyu poligrafa [About “a unified scientific methodological approach” to the polygraph use]. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya – Legal Psychology, 1, 11-13 [in Russian].
27. Chebykin O.Ya. & Pavlova, I.G. (2009). Stanovlennia emotsiynoyi zrilosti osobystosti: monohrafiia [Development of emotional maturity of personality: a monograph]. Odesa: SVD Cherkasov [in Ukrainian].
28. Shcherbatyh, Yu.V. (2002). Iskusstvo obmana: populiarnaya entsiklopediya [The art of deception: a popular encyclopedia]. Moscow: Izd-vo “Eksmo-Press” [in Russian].
29. Ekman, P. (1999) Psikhologiya lzhi [Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
30. Ekman, P. (2010). Psikhologiya emotsiy [Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life]. SaintPetersburg: Piter [in Russian].
31. Bella M. DePaulo. Deborah A. Kashy, Susan E. Kirkendol, Melissa M. Wyer. & Jennifer A. Epstein. (1998). Lying in Everyday Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 991–993 [in English].
32. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Sussex [in English].
33. Borland, G.H.& Raskin D.С. (1973). Detection of deception. Electrodernial activity in psychological research, 419-477. N.Y.: Acad. Press [in English].
34. Carson Th. L., Wokutch R.E. & Cox J.E. (1989). An ethical analysis of deception in advertizing. Contemporary moral controversies in business, 384-394. N.Y. [in English].
35. Ekman, P. & Frank, M.G. Lies That Fail. In Lewis, M. & Saarni, C. (Eds.) (1993). Lying and deception in everyday life, 184–200. New York: Guilford Press [in English].
36. Goleman, D. (2000). Working with Emotional Intelligence. London: Bloomsburry Paperbacks [in English].
37. Hopper, R., & Bell, R.A. (1984). Broadening the Deception Construct. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 288–302 [in English].
38. Koenigs, M. & Tranel, D. (2007). Irrational Economic Decision – Making after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(4), 951–956 [in English].
39. Leeper, R.W. (1965). Some needed developments in the motivational theory of emotions. – In: Nebraska symposium on motivation, 13, 26, 34–40, 44–46, 51–57, 65–66 [in English].
40. Levenson, R.W., Ekman, P., Heider, K., & Friesin, W.V. (1992). Emotion and automic nervous system activity in an Indonesian culture. Journal of personality and social psychology, 62, 927–988 [in English].
41. Lindskold, S., Walters, P.S., & Koutsourais, H. (1983). Cooperators, Competitors, and Response to GRTT. Journal of Conflict Resolution 27, 3, 521–532 [in English].
42. Lykken, D. (1974). Psychology and the lie detection industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725–739 [in English].
43. National Research Council The Polygraph and Lie Detection (2002). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press [in English].
44. Nelson, R. (2015). Scientific Basis for Polygraph Testing. Polygraph, 44(1), 28–61 [in English].
45. Von Eckhartshausen, Karl (2005). The Absolute Truth Lying the in the Center of the Mystery. Kessinger Publishing [in English].
46. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L. & Morris, P. (1997). Individual differences in hand movements during deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 87–102.
47. Vrij A., Granhag P.A., Verschuere B. (2015). Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches. John Wiley & Sons [in English].
48. Wilson, G. (2016). Body Language: The Signals You Don't Know You're Sending, and How to Master Them. United Kingdom: Icon Books Ltd [in English].