Nataliia Donii. Identity Crisis and Its Role in Amplification of Social Devitalization of Personality.

(2017) Science and education, 7, 126-129. Odessa.


DOI:

Nataliia Donii,
Doctor of Philosophy, associate professor,
Department of Economics and Social Disciplines,
Academy of State Penitentiary Service,
34, Honcha Str., Chernihiv, Ukraine


IDENTITY CRISIS AND ITS ROLE IN AMPLIFICATION
OF SOCIAL DEVITALIZATION OF PERSONALITY


SUMMARY:

The paper deals with identity crisis as a state determined by the changes in social environment of the 19th -20th centuries and the destruction of a mechanism allowing people to establish their belonging to a certain group. Identity crisis exhausts a person by the necessity of searching for the answer to the question “Who am I?” Such a state has arisen because of the identity’s loss of stability, conservatism of the structure which was a set of psycho-age characteristics which gradually replaced each other. In the development of social devitalization, identity crisis acts as a source of impulse of searching for aspects by the personality, which provide his/her internal organization. In a situation of social devitalization, a personality hopes for social revitalization after overcoming the state of identity crisis.


KEYWORDS:

identity, identity crisis, social environment, social devitalization, anomie.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Andreeva, G. (2011). K voprosu o krizise identichnosti v usloviyakh sotsialnykh transformatsiy [On the question of the identity crisis in the conditions of social transformation] Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal – Psychological research: an electronic scientific journal, №6 (20). Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2011n6-20/580[in Russian].
2. Andreeva, G. (2009). Sotsialnaya identichnost: vremennyye i sredovyye komponenty [Social identity: temporal and environmental components]. Psihologiya lichnosti v trudah otechestvennyh psihologov: khrestomatiya – Psychology of personality in the works of domestic psychologists: chrestomathy, (pp.218-225). St. Petersburg : Piter [in Russian].
3. Bauman, Z. (2002). Individualizirovannoe obshhestvo [The Individualized Society]. Mosco : Logos [in Russian].
4. Behterev, V.M. (1994). Izbrannye raboty po sotsialnoy psikhologii [Selected works on social psychology]. Moscow : Nauka [in Russian].
5. Delez, Zh. (2010). Tysyacha plato : Kapitalizm i shizofreniya [A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya [in Russia].
6. Toffler, Е. (1999). Tretiya volna [The Third Wave]. Moscow: OOO «Firma «Izdatetstvo ACT». [in Russian].
7. Kondakov, I.V., Sokolov, K.B., Khrenov, N.A. (2011). Tsivilizatsionnaya indentichnost v perehodnuyu epokhu: kulturologicheskiy, sotsiologicheskiy i iskusstvovedcheskiy aspekty [Civilizational identity in a transitional era: culturological, sociological and artistic aspects]. Moscow : Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].
8. Erikson, E. (2006). Identichnost: yunost i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis]. Moscow: Flinta, MPSI, Progress [in Russian].
9. Giddens, A. (2006). Modernity and Self-Identity : Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing Ltd [in English].
10. Tajfe,l H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.