Оksana Pavliuk, Тetiana Chopyk, Oleksandr Antoniuk, Yevhen Pavliuk, Oleksandr Soltyk, Jacek Biliński. Pedagogical Technology of Physical Education Teachers’ Professional Self-Improvement.

(2017) Science and education, 4, 101-106. Odessa.

Оksana Pavliuk,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), associate professor,
Department of Physical Education,
Тetiana Chopyk,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), associate professor,
Department of Physical Education,
Oleksandr Antoniuk,
PhD (Candidate of Sciences in Physical Education and Sports), associate professor,
Department of Physical Education,
Yevhen Pavliuk,
PhD (Candidate of Sciences in Physical Education and Sports), associate professor,
Department of Human Health,
Oleksandr Soltyk,
PhD (Candidate of Sciences in Physical Education and Sports), associate professor,
Head of the Department of Physical Education, Khmelnytsky National University,
11, Instytutska Str., Khmelnytsky, Ukraine,
Jacek Biliński,
PhD, lecturer,
Department of Tourism and Recreation, Faculty of Medicine,
University of Computer Science and Management,
2, Sucharskiego Str., Rzeszów, Poland


PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION
TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL SELF-IMPROVEMENT


SUMMARY:

Physical Education teachers’ professional self-improvement comprises motivational, activity, informational and operational, gnostic, and communicative components. The level of these components can be assessed by the demand and motivational, functional, theoretical and methodical, communicative, as well as informational and operational criteria. It has been experimentally proved that the following pedagogical conditions contribute to Physical Education teachers’ professional selfimprovement: taking into account teachers’ individual and age peculiarities; encouraging Physical Education teachers to self-improvement in the process of professional activities; provision of choosing personal trajectory of self-improvement taking into account the guidelines for professional development. The designed pedagogical technology aimed at Physical Education teachers’ professional self-improvement consists of four blocks: targeted, content, organizational and active, and control and effective ones. The implementation of this pedagogical technology results in positive dynamics of Physical Education teachers’ professional self-improvement which has been experimentally proved.


KEYWORDS:

self-improvement pedagogical technology in the process of professional activity, physical training teachers, guideline of professional perfection, pedagogical technology, pedagogical conditions.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Babanskiy, Yu. К. (1989). Izbrannye pedagogicheskiye trudy [Selected pedagogical works]. Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].
2. Vaynilenko, Т. V. (2005). Sutnist ta zmist profesiino-pedahohichnoho samovdoskonalennia [Essense and contents of professional pedagogical selfimprovement]. Naukovyi visnyk Chenivetskogo universytetu – Scientific journal of Chernivtsi University. Series: Pedagogika i psykhologiya (Eidtion 278). (pp. 13-20). Chernivtsi: Ruta [in Ukrainian].
3. Kolodeznikov, К. S. (2010). Organizatsionnopedagogicheskiye usloviya samosovershenstvovaniya budushchego spetsialista phisicheskoy kultury i sporta v vuze [Organizational pedagogical conditions for selfdevelopment of a future specialist in physical education and sport in higher educational establishment]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Yakutsk [in Russian].
4. Ksyonzenko, М. А. (2012). Motyvatsiya samovdoskonalennya vchytelya yak klyuchovyi psychologichnyi chynnyk yogo proifesiynogo zrostannya [Motivation for teacher’s self-development as a basic psychological factor of his/her professional development]. Naukova skarbnytsya osvity Donetchiny – Scientific treasure of Donetsk region, 2, 90-93. Donetsk [in Ukrainian].
5. Nisimchuk, А. S., Padalka, O. S., Shpak, O. T. (2000). Suchasni pedagogichni tekhnologii [Modern pedagogical technologies]. Кyiv.: «Prosvita» Publishers [in Ukrainian].
6. Pavliuk, О. S. (2012). Analiz pidkhodiv vyznachennya profesiynogo samovdoskonalennya u pedagogichniy sphere [The analysis of approaches to define professional self-development in pedagogical sphere]. Suchasni informatsiyni tekhnologii ta innovatsiyni metodyky navchannya v pidgotovtsi fakhivtsiv: metodologiya, teoriya, dosdiv, problemy – Scientific journal “Modern information technologies and innovational methods of education in specialists training: methods, theory, experience, problems”, 30, 56-61. Vinnytsya [in Ukrainian].
7. Pavliuk, О. S. (2013). Strukturna kharakterystyka modeli profesiynoyi doskonalosti vykladacha fizychnogo vykhovannya [Structural characteristics of professional perfection model of a teacher of physical education]. Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnogo pedagogichnogo universytetu imeni M. P. Drogomanova – Scientific papers of M.P. Dragomanov National Pedagogical University (Edition 5(30)13). (pp. 180 – 185) [in Ukrainian].
8. Pavliuk, О. S. (2014). Efektyvnist pedahohichnoi tekhnolohii profesiinoho samovdoskonalennia vykladacha fizychnoho vykhovannia u protsesi profesiinoi diyalnosti: resultaty formuvalnoho etapu eksperymentu [Effectiveness of pedagogical technology of professional selfdevelopment of a teacher of physical education in the process of professional activity: the results of formative stage of experiment]. Pedagogika ta psykhologiya – Pedagogy and psychology, 687, 109-116). Chernivtsi: Chernivtsi National University [in Ukrainian].
9. Sysoyeva, S. О. (2002). Pedahohichni tekhnolohii: strukturno-funktsionalnyi analiz [Pedagogical technologies: structural and functional analysis]. Suchasni informatsiyni tekhnologii ta innovatsiyni metodyky navchannya v pidgotovtsi fakhivtsiv: metodologiya, teoriya, dosvid, problem – Scientific journal “Modern information technologies and innovational methods of education in specialists training: methods, theory, experience, problems”. (pp. 86 – 91). Vinnytsya: DOV «Vinytsya» [in Russian].
10. Selevko, H. К. (2005). Pedagogicheskiy tekhnologii na osnove didakticheskogo i metodicheskogo usovershenstvovaniya [Pedagogical technologies on the basis of didactic and methodological development]. Мoscow: NII «Shkolnye tekhnologii» [in Russian].
11. Barbuto, J. (1996). A self-concept-based model of work motivation: a class exercise. Proceedings of the Eastern Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Washington, DC [in English].
12. Guerrero, S. M. (2005). Teacher knowledge and a new domain of expertise: pedagogical technology knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research,  249-267 (Vol. 33) [in English].
13. Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2001). The occupational socialization of a first-year physical education teacher with a Teaching Orientation. Sport, Education and Society, 6(1), 81-105 [in English].
14. Pavliuk, O. S. (2014). Defining the actual indexes of self-improvement of the physical-training teacher in the process of the occupational activity. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta – Scientific journal “Scientific notes of P.F. Lesgafta University”, 1 (107), 133-139 [in English].
15. Pavliuk, Ye. O. (2015). Classification of the future coaches-instructors professional training at the higher education establishments. Středoevropskývěstníkpro vědu a výzkum, 6 (19), 57-60 [in English].
16. Pavliuk, Ye. O. (2015). Defining quality of the future coaches-instructors’ professional competence in the process of training. European Applied Sciences, 6, 28-29 [in English].
17. Passmore, J. (2000). The Perfectibility of Man. 3 rded. Indianapolis, Ind. : LibertyFund [in English].
18. Steven, C. (2016). Wright Professional socialization issues pertaining to physical education majors. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(1)), 57-59 [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.