Ivan Voloshchuk, Yaroslav Rudyk, Olena Soloviova. Measurement of Giftedness: Annoying Failures and Great Discoveries.

(2017) Science and education, 4, 91-100. Odessa.

Ivan Voloshchuk,
Doctor of pedagogy, associate professor,
Yaroslav Rudyk,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), associate professor,
Department of Teaching Methods and Educational Institutions Management,
Olena Soloviova,
senior lecturer, Department Romance and Germanic Languages and Translation,degree-seeking student,
The National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,
15, Heroiv Oborony Str., Kyiv, Ukraine


MEASUREMENT OF GIFTEDNESS:
ANNOYING FAILURES AND GREAT DISCOVERIES


SUMMARY:

The article presents the results of the research on intelligence, giftedness and its measurement which demonstrate strong and weak points of solving the problem of measuring gifted individuals. Intelligence comes out as a mental construct of intelligent behaviour and giftedness is given as its attribute. Intelligent behaviour is structurally presented; this serves a theoretical basis for the measurement of giftedness which is based on the suggested principles. The issue of development of giftedness is brought to the open and social and pedagogical conditions are considered to be necessary to change structural components of giftedness quantitatively.


KEYWORDS:

instinctive behaviour, reactive behaviour, intelligent behaviour, intelligence, giftedness, measurement of giftedness.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Spearman, C. (1904). General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201-292 [in English].
2. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press [in English].
3. Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action (Vol. 35). Elsevier [in English].
4. Gardner, H. (2007). Struktura razuma: teoriya mnozhestvennogo intellekta [Structure of intellect: theory of multiple intelligence]. Moscow: OOO «YD Vyliams [in Russian].
5. Binet, A. (1900). Attention et adaptation [Attention and adaptation]. L'année psychologique – The psychological year, 6(1), 248-404 [in French].
6. Wechsler D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation [in English].
7. Snigireva, T. A. (2006). Osnovy kvalitativnoy tekhnologii diagnostiki struktury znaniy obuchaemykh [Foundations of qualitative technology of the students’ knowledge structure diagnostocs]. Izhevsk: Ekspertiza [in Russian].
8. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftendness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness, Cambridge University Press, New York, (pp. 332-357). [in English].
9. Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. (1970). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 [Intelligence-structure-test]. R. Göttingen: Hogrefe [in German].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.