Maryna Puliaievska. The Role of Context And Intent in the Formation of Perceptual Content and Behaviour.

(2017) Science and education, 3, 68-72. Odessa.

Maryna Puliaievska,
PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences), senior lecturer,
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Interregional Academy of Personnel Management,
2, Frometivska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine


THE ROLE OF CONTEXT AND INTENT IN THE
FORMATION OF PERCEPTUAL CONTENT AND BEHAVIOUR


SUMMARY:

The paper deals with the issues of interrelation between external objects perception, vectors of involvement and behaviours of individuals. Perceptual context is defined as a set of factors including conditions and content of individual’s living and related “involvement vector”, i.e. emotional and evaluative attitudes towards external objects. Based on the conception of contextual dependence of perceptual content, the role of intent in its formation has been determined. Intent is the driving force for evolution of the content of perceiving reality in individual’s consciousness. Besides, intent facilitates both the creating of the new content of perceiving the future and changing of the content of reality perception. Individual’s future behaviour is formed under the impact of these types of the content. Methods of psychosemantics and theory of planned behaviour are used for analysing perceptual contexts and predicting behaviour of an individual.


KEYWORDS:

perceptual context, perceptual content, intent, psychosemantics, behaviour, planned behaviour theory.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Medvedev, N. V. (2014). Priroda chelovecheskoy kommunikatsii [The nature of human communication]. Vestnik TGU − Bulletin of TSU, 12 (140), 1-5 [in Russian]. 2. Petrenko, V. F. (2009). Mnogomernoe soznanie: psikhosemanticheskaya paradigma [Multidimensional consciousness: a psychosemantic paradigm]. Moscow: Novyi khronograf [in Russian]. 3. Stanzhevskiy, F. A. (2015). K «pragmaticheskoy» i interaktivnoy paradigme issledovaniya intersubyektivnosti [About “pragmatic” and interactive paradigm of investigating intersubjectivity]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology and philosophy of science, 2 (44), 90-104 [in Russian]. 4. Turchak, A. L. (2011). Formuvannia sotsialnoi potreby fizychnoho vdoskonalennia u studentiv vyschykh pedahohichnykh navchalnykh zakladiv [Formation of social need for physical improvement in students of higher educational institutions]. Naukovi zapysky KDPU. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky − Scientific notes of KSPU. Series: Teaching Sciences, 97, 306-310 [in Ukraine]. 5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. Handbook of attitudes. (pp. 173- 221). D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, M. P. Zanna (Eds.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates [in English]. 6. DeRose, K. (2009). The Case for contextualism: knowledge, skepticism, and context. Oxford: Oxford University Press [in English]. 7. Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press [in English]. 8. Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., & Lois, D. (2013). Cycling habits and other psychological variables affecting commuting by bicycle in Madrid, Spain. Transportation research record journal of the transportation research board, 2382(1), 1-9 [in English]. 9. Phillips, Ben S. (2016). Seeing and perceptual content. CUNY Academic Works. Retrieved from: http://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1405 [in English]. 10. Weber, K. (2013). Access to information and fragmentation of knowledge and society. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2234477. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256052865_Acc ess_to_Information_and_Fragmentation_of_Knowledge_ and_Society [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.