Simin Sattarpour. The Impact of Proficiency Level on Receptive and Productive Vocabulary of Efl Learners.

(2017) Science and education, 2, 84-94. Odessa.

Anna Baliuk,
post-graduate student, Department of Pedagogy,
South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odesa, Ukraine


THE IMPACT OF PROFICIENCY LEVEL ON RECEPTIVE
AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY OF EFL LEARNERS


SUMMARY:

To know a word means both recognizing and using it correctly (Pignot-Shahov, 2012). The scarcity of the research and the inconsistent reports about the nature of the relationship between receptive (R) and productive (P) vocabulary knowledge indicate the complexity of this issue. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between these two types of English vocabulary knowledge as a whole and also in different frequency bands, across two proficiency levels. Version A of the R and P Vocabulary Levels Tests were distributed among 100 EFL learners of two proficiency levels. It was found that R vocabulary size was always greater than the P one, and that the gap between them widened as the frequency of words decreased. Although the participants progressed in R and P vocabulary knowledge, the proficiency level did not make any significant difference in the nature of the relationship between R and P vocabularies. It was concluded that the EFL context can be an important factor that hinders the turning of R vocabulary into P one.


KEYWORDS:

receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary, Vocabulary Level Test, EFL Learners.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum.

2. Anderson, R.C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J.T. Guthrie (Ed.). Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

3. Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Corson, D.J. (1995). Using English words. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

5. Crow, J.T. (1986). Receptive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 70, 242-250.

6. Fan, M. (2000). How big is the gap and how to narrow it? An investigation into the active and passive vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners. RELC Journal, 31(2), 105-119.

7. Harrington, M., & Carey, M. (2009). The on-line Yes/No test as a placement tool. System, 37(4), 614-626.

8. Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303-317.

9. Henriksen, B., & Haastrup, K. (1998). Describing learners‟ lexical competence across tasks and over time: A focus on research design. In K. Haastrup, & A. Viberg (Eds.). Perspectives on lexical acquisition in second languages (pp. 61-95). Sweden: Lund University Press.

10. Hilton, H. (2008). The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 153-166.

11. Klein-Braley, C., & Rattz, U. (1984). A Survey of research on the C-test. Language Testing, 1(2), 134- 146.

12. Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In Arnaud, P.J.L. and Béjoint, H. (eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (pp. 126–132). London: Macmillan.

13. Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19, 255-271.

14. Laufer, B. (2005). Lexical frequency profiles: From Monte Carlo to the real world. A response to Meara (2005). Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 582-588.

15. Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K., & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing, 21(2), 202- 226.

16. Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399-436.

17. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 307-322.

18. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabularysize test of controlled productive vocabulary. Language Testing, 16(1), 33-51.

19. Laufer, B., & Paribakht, T. S. (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language learning, 48(3), 365-391.

20. Meara, P. (1990). A note on passive vocabulary. Second Language Research, 6, 150-154.

21. Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 84-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

22. Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

23. Nation, P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5(1), 12-25.

24. Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Mass.: Newbury House.

25. Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26. Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.

27. Nemati, A. (2010). Active and passive vocabulary knowledge: The effect of years of instruction. Asian EFL Journal, 12(1), 30-46.

28. Pignot-Shahov, V. (2012). Measuring L2 receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. Language Studies Working Papers, 4, 37-45.

29. Qian, D. D., & Schedle, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21, 28-52.

30. Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

32. Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88.

33. Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577-607. 34. Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 79-95.

35. Wei, M. (2007). An examination of vocabulary learning of college level learners of English in China. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 93-114.

36. Wilkins, D.A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Arnold.

37. Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236-259.

38. Zhong, H. (2012). Multidimensional vocabulary knowledge: Development from receptive to productive use. In D. Hirsh, (Ed.). Current perspectives in second language vocabulary research. Berlin: Peter Lang.

39. Zhong, H., & Hirsh, D. (2009). Vocabulary growth in an English as a foreign language context. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 4, 85-113.

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.