Nataliia Aleksandrova, Larysa Sluchaina. Enhancing Phd Students’ Academic Writing Skills in The Process of Learning English.

(2017) Science and education, 12, 183-189. Odessa.


DOI:

Nataliia Aleksandrova,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), associate professor,
Larysa Sluchaina,
PhD (Candidate of Political Sciences), associate professor,
Foreign Languages and Intercultural Communication Department,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Avenue, Kyiv, Ukraine


ENHANCING PhD STUDENTSS’ ACADEMIC WRITING
SKILLS IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING ENGLISH


SUMMARY:

The paper aims to substantiate the designed technique of PhD students’ academic writing skills development, which includes the stages of formation, the content and functional components, as well as the corresponding organizational forms and methods of interaction between a teacher and postgraduate students in the process of learning a foreign language. At the initial and final stages of the verification of the effectiveness of the implementation of the developed technique, specially designed diagnostic methods and questionnaires aimed at identifying value orientations and motives of studying the basics of academic writing, the initial and acquired levels of language knowledge (English) at the postgraduate level in the process of studying the discipline were applied. The evaluation of the results took place according to the following criteria: value orientations and motives, knowledge of academic vocabulary and grammatical accuracy; and indicators: motives, vocabulary, lexical knowledge, grammatical awareness, academic writing skills. As a result of the study, most of the respondents (n=50) had insufficient knowledge and skills of academic writing. As a result of the carried out experiment, the effectiveness of implementation of the designed technique has been proved.


KEYWORDS:

PhD students, academic writing skills, research work, method of developing skills, enhancing academic writing skills, academic writing style.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Hartley, James. (2008). Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Guide. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from: http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/academicwriting [in English].
2. Jordan R. R. (2004). Academic writing course. Study skills in English. Retrieved from: http://univer.nuczu.edu.ua/tmp_metod/3019/Jordan_R._A cademic_writing_course.pdf [in English].
3. Panych, Olena. (2016). Pidhotovka naukovtsiv: praktyka i problemy [Preparing scholars: practice and problems]. Retrieved from: https://osvita.ua/vnz/reform/58758/. [in Ukrainian].
4. Denzin, Norman. K., Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2000). Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from: http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/qualitative [in English].
5. Gu, Y (2014). To code or not to code: Dilemmas in analysing think-aloud protocols in learning strategies research. System 43: 74–81. [in English].
6. Larkin, Li Li and Sh (2017). The role of metacognition in the success of reading and writing tasks across cultures. Retrieved from : https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attach ments/pub_eltra_h094_role_of_metacognition.pdf[in English].
7. Lugovyy V., Slyusarenko O., Talanova Zh. (2015). Universytety ta akademii: fundamentalni instytuty svitovoho osvitno-naukovoho prostoru [Universities and academies: fundamental institutions of world educational and research area]. Higher education of Ukraine: Theoretical and academic magazine, 3, 150-159. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
8. Maiboroda V. (2015). Utochnennia y identyfikatsiia priorytetnykh kompetentnostei naukovopedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv [Clarify and identify priority competence research and teaching staff]. Higher education of Ukraine: Theoretical and academic journal, 3, 163-169. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Slipukhina I., Chernetskiy I. (2015). Doslidnytska diialnist studentiv u konteksti vykorystannia naukovoho y inzhenernoho metodiv [Students’ research work in the context of using scientific and engineering methods]. Higher education of Ukraine: Theoretical and academic journal, 3, 216-225. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
10. Strelchenko L. (2015). Rozvytok informatsiinokomunikatsiinoi kompetentnosti studentiv v doslidnytskii diialnosti v universytetakh Velykoi Brytanii [Development of Information and communication competence of students in research in the UK universities]. Higher education of Ukraine: Theoretical and academic journal, 3, 225-231. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
11. Yaroshenko O. (2015). Umovy realizatsii naukovodoslidnytskoi diialnosti sub`iektiv universytetu v oriientovanomu na doslidzhennia osvitnomu seredovyshchi [Conditions for science research activity realization of the subjects of university in educational environment oriented research]. Higher education of Ukraine: Theoretical and academic journal, 3, 286-291. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
12. Yang, SC (2003). Reconceptualizing think-aloud methodology refining the encoding and categorizing techniques via contextualized perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 95–115 [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.