(2017) Science and education, 12, 171-175. Odessa.

Nataliia Konoshenko,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences),
head of the Department of Social Education and Social Work,
Sergii Konoshenko,
Doctor of Pedagogy, dean of the Faculty of Pedagogy,
professor, Department of Social Education and Social Work,
Donbas State Pedagogical University,
1, Uchytelskyi lane, Sloviansk, Ukraine

USING INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN SOCIAL CARE TEACHERS
TRAINING IN TERMS OF PREVENTIVE WORK WITH MINOR CHILDREN

The paper aims to substantiate the feasibility of using interactive teaching technologies in the process of future social care teachers in terms of preventive work with minors. The greatest pedagogical effect in the process of forming the students’ competence in terms of preventive activities was observed due to the introduction of interactive teaching technologies that are characterized by the organization of the learning process in which a student cannot but takes part - in a collective, complementary one, which is based on the interaction of all its participants. The following technologies of interactive teaching are proved to be the most effective in forming future social care teachers’ competence in preventive activities: gaming technology, problem learning technology, training technology. It was these technologies that were introduced into the educational process with the experimental group of students within “Fundamentals of Preventive Work” course and internship and proved their effectiveness in terms of competence in preventive work with minors.

education, formation, readiness, prevention, social teacher, interactive technology, game, training.

1. Antoni, M.A. (2010). Interaktivnye metody obucheniya kak potencial lichnostnogo razvitiya studentov [Interactive methods of teaching as a potential for personal development of students]. Psihologiya obucheniya – Psychology of teaching, 12, 53-63 [in Russian].
2. Zvyeryeva, I.D. (2002). Entsyklopediya dlya fakhivtsiv sotsialnoi sfery [Encyclopedia for professionals in the social sphere]. Kyiv: Universam [in Ukrainian].
3. Konoshenko, S. V. (2016). Rozrobka diahnostychnoho instrumentariiu dlia vyznachennia rivnia hotovnosti maibutnikh sotsialnykh pedahohiv do profilaktychnoi roboty z pidlitkamy [Development of diagnostic tools for determining the level of readiness of future social educators for preventive work with adolescents]. Proceedings from MIIM '16: Vseukrainska naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Sotsialno-pravovi ta orhanizatsiino-upravlinski aspekty roboty pratsivnykiv sotsialnoi y osvitnoi sfer z riznymy subiektamy suchasnoho sotsiumu» – All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference «Socio-legal and organizationalmanagerial aspects of work of social and educational workers with different subjects of modern society». (рр. 42 – 46) Kharkiv : FOP Petrov V.V. [in Ukrainian].
4. Pometun, O.I. & Pyrozhenko, L.V. (2002). Suchasnyi urok. Interaktyvni teлрnolohii navchannia [Contemporary lesson. Interactive learning technologies].Kyiv:A.S.K. [in Ukrainian].
5. Gramzow, R., Sedikides, C. , Panter, A., Harris, J. (2004). Patterns of Self-regulation and Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 18, 367-385 [in English].
6. Marshall, K. (2012). Resilience Research for Prevention Programs. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota [in English].
7. Roblyer M. (2009). Integrating educational technology into teaching. San-Diego, CA : Resiliency in Action, inc [in English].