Personal Factors of Risk Behavior of Modern Youth

(2017) Science and education, 11, 165-171. Odessa.


DOI:

Valerii Sokurenko,
Doctor of Law, associate professor,
rector of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs,
Mykhailo Burdin,
Doctor of Law, associate professor,
vice rector of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs,
Yurii Paida,
PhD (Candidate of Legal Sciences), associate professor,
Department of General Law Disciplines, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs,
27, Lva Landau avenue, Kharkiv, Ukraine,


PERSONAL FACTORS OF RISK BEHAVIOR OF MODERN YOUTH


SUMMARY:

The paper deals with the influence of personal factors on manifestations of risk behavior in young people. Risk behavior is usually associated with personality challenge and danger. Objective assessment of risk and its degree in the performance of appropriate tasks, the manifestation of predisposition to risk behavior is extremely important for the safety of the personality in a variety of life situations. This is especially true for young people, because their risk appetite arises through the search for adventures, interesting events, intense emotions and, accordingly, the internal readiness to take risks at different levels (physical, social, legal) for acquiring experience through the realization of risk actions. The article describes emotional, cognitive and volitional components in the structure of risk behavior. Based on the results of the conducted empirical research (comparative and correlation analysis), the following personal factors contributing to the formation of risk behavior of modern youth have been found: masculinity, sociability, reactive aggression, self-confidence and shyness. According to the results of the study, students have a low level of self-control, which can provoke the emergence of risk actions, because it involves the inability to resist circumstances, the lack of trends of searching for causes of actions and results in themselves. 


KEYWORDS:

risk, risk appetite, risk behavior, predisposition to risk, readiness for risk, need for feelings, selfcontrol.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Algin, A. P. (1989). Risk i ego rol v obshchestvennoi zhizni [Risk and its role in public life]. Moscow, Buks-press [in Russian].
2. Bunas, A. A. (2013). Razlichnye aspekty obosnovaniia prirody riskovannogo povedeniia lichnosti [Various aspects of the justification the nature of risky behavior of personality]. Psikhologiia: problemy prakticheskogo primeneniia: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauch. konf.− Psychology: problems of practical application: materials II Intern. sci. Conf. 10-16. Chita: Izdatelstvo Molodoi uchenyi. Retrieved from: https://moluch.ru/conf/psy/archive/82/4049/ [in Russian].
3. Bocharova, E.E. (2011). Gotovnost k risku i subieektivnoe blagopoluchie lichnosti [Willingness to risk and subjective well-being personality] Psikhologiia sotsialnykh i ekologicheskikh riskov v sovremennom obshchestve: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauch.-prakt. konf. − Psychology of social and environmental risks in modern society: Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference. 30-37. Saratov [in Russian].
4. Vdovychenko, O.V (2005). Chynnyky, shcho vplyvaiut na proiav ryzyku [Factors influencing the manifestation of risk] Pedahohika i psykholohiia. − Pedagogy and psychology. 3, 107-111[in Ukrainian].
5. Ilin, E. P. (2012) Psikhologiia riska [Psychology of risk]. Saintpetersburg: Mastera psikhologi [in Russian].
6. Kaliuzhnyi, A.A. (2011). Sotsialnye riski v srede studencheskoi molodezhi [Social risks among students]. Psikhologiia sotsialnykh i ekologicheskikh riskov v sovremennom obshchestve: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauch.-prakt. konf. − Psychology of social and environmental risks in modern society: Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference. 19-26. Saratov [in Russian].
7. Kogan N. (2008). Oshibki vospriiatiia riska [Mistakes in risk perception]. Nauka i tekhnika. − Science and technology.12, 48-55 [in Russian]/
8. Petrovskii, V. A. (1999). Neadaptivnyi risk i opyt interpretatsii [Non-adaptive risk and experience of interpretation]. Upravlenie riskom. − Risk management.3, 34- 39 [in Russian].
9. Sannikova O.P. (2003). Fenomenologiia lichnosti [Phenomenology of risk]. Kiyv,Odessa: SMIL [in Russian].
10. Friman, A., Defulf, R. (2000).10 glupeishikh oshibok, kotorye sovershaiut liudi [10 the most stupid mistakes which people make]. SaintPeterburg: Piter [in Russian].
11. Chovushian, E. O., Sidorov, M. A. (1999). Upravlenie riskom i ustoichivo razvitie [Risk management and sustainable development]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo REA [in Russian]. Психологія – Psychology Science and Education, 2017, Issue 11 171
12. Frankl, V. (2015) Chelovek v poiskakh smysla [Man's Search for Meaning]. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
13. Irwin, C.E (1993). Adolescence and risk taking: how are they related? Alolescent Risk Taking. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.