Tetiana Yeremenko, Iryna Lukyanchenko, Anastasiia Yumrukuz. Developing Master Students’ Professional Speech Competence in Pre-Service English Teacher Training: Possibilities, Problems and Recommendations.

(2017) Science and education, 10, 32-39. Odessa.


DOI:

Tetiana Yeremenko,
PhD (Candidate of Philological Sciences), professor,
Head of the Department of the Germanic Philology and Methods
of Teaching Foreign Languages,
Iryna Lukyanchenko,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), associate professor,
Anastasiia Yumrukuz,
PhD (Candidate of Philological Sciences), teaching assistant,
Department of the Germanic Philology and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages,
South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odesa, Ukraine


DEVELOPING MASTER STUDENTS’ PROFESSIONAL
SPEECH COMPETENCE IN PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH TEACHER
TRAINING: POSSIBILITIES, PROBLEMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


SUMMARY:

There has recently been a significant increase in the level of interest to finding new forms, methods and means of prospective foreign language teachers’ professional training optimization. The research is focused on the developing MA students’ professional speech competence as a component of their professional education. In the study the following methods were used: literature and curricula review, empirical (testing, expert assessment) methods, data mathematical processing. The aim of the article is to present the content and the aprobation results of the specialized training course for MA students “English Language Teaching Discourse: Developing Teacher Awareness”. This course is aimed at developing MA students’ professional speech competence, increasing their awareness of running interactive classes in the English language and helping them develop into aware self-critical teachers, improving their teaching styles. The content of the course covers a range of core issues with specific reference to EL use in classroom interaction and includes the following content modules: Generalities of ELT Discourse; Categories of Teachers’ Verbal Behaviour; Reflective Observation in the EL Classroom. The course focuses on students’ autonomy, with the teacher’s role being that of mediator, and implies performing highly-interactive tasks. The experiment results testify the efficacy of the course for developing MA students’ professional speech competence developing their awareness of appropriate verbal behavior in ELT classroom.


KEYWORDS:

professional speech competence, MA students, specialized training course, ELT discourse, awareness of running classes in English, experiential learning.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Amirkhanova, K.M. (2014). Mesto tekhniki napisaniia refleksivnogo zhurnala v formirovanii refleksivnogo myshleniia studentov pri obuchenii inostrannomu iazyku [The place of the reflexive journal writing technique in the formation of students’ reflective thinking in teaching a foreign language]. Filologiia i kultura. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki. Pedagogika – Philology and Culture. Psychological and pedagogical sciences. Pedagogy. 1 (35), (pp. 264–269) [in Russian].
2. Bespalko, V.P. (1968). Opyt razrabotki i ispolzovaniia kriteriev kachestva usvoeniia znanii [Experience in the development and use of the quality of knowledge acquisition criteria]. Sovetskaia pedagogika – Soviet pedagogy, Vol. 4. (pp. 52–69) [in Russian].
3. Ezhova, T.V. (2006). K problem izucheniia pedagogicheskogo diskursa. [To the problem of pedagogical discourse study]. Vestnik OGPU, Vol. 2. (pp. 52–56) [in Russian].
4. Karasik, V.I. (1999). Kharakteristiki pedagogicheskogo diskursa [Characteristics of pedagogical discourse] // Iazykovaia lichnost: aspekty lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki – Language personality: aspects of linguistics and linguodidactics, (pp. 3–18). Volgograd: Peremena [in Russian].
5. Oleshkov, M.Yu. (2006) Osnovnyye parametry modeli professionalnoy kommunikatsii (na primere didakticheskogo diskursa) [The main parameters of professional communication model (on the material of didactic discourse)]. A.A. Verbitskiy, N.V. Zhukova (Eds.), Sotsiokulturnyye problemy v obrazovanii – Socio-cultural problems in education: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. (pp. 62–71). Moscow: RITS MGOPU named after M.A. Sholokhov [in Russian].
6. Rubtsova, L.V. (2006). Formirovannie professionalnoy rechevoy kompetentsii budushchykh uchiteley inostrannogo yazyka [Developing professional speech competence of future foreign language teacher]. Candidate’s thesis. Toliati [in Russian].
7. Solovova, E.N. (2004). Metodicheskaia podgotovka i perepodgotovka uchitelia inostrannogo iazyka: integrativnorefleksivnyi podkhod [Methodological training and retraining of a foreign language teacher: integrative-reflexive approach]. Moscow: GLOSSA-PRESS [In Russian].
8. Fatkhullina, R.R. (2004) Formirovanie rechevoi kompetentsii kak osnovy professionalnoi deiatelnosti budushchikh uchitelei inostrannogo iazyka [Developing speech competence as a basis for prospective foreign language teachers’ professional activity]. Candidate’s thesis. Ulianovsk [in Russian].
9. Shcherbinina, Iu.V. (2010). Pedagogicheskii diskurs: myslit – govorit –deistvovat [Pedagogical discourse: to think – to speak – to act]. – Moscow: Flinta: Nauka [in Russian].
10. Alexander, R.J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). York, UK: Dialogos [in English].
11. Bartlett, L. (1990). Teacher Development through Reflective Teaching. Jack C. Richards & David Nunan (Eds.), Second Language Teacher Education. (pp. 202–214). New York: Cambridge University Press [in English].
12. Bowers, R. (1980) Verbal Behaviour in the Language Teaching Classroom. PhD thesis, Reading University, Reading, UK. [in English].
13. Calderhead, J. & Gates, P. (1993) Conceptualizing Reflection in Teacher Development. Washington, D.C. [in English].
14. Consolo, D.A. (2006). Classroom oral interaction in foreign language lessons and implications for teacher development. Linguagem & Ensino, 9(2), (pp. 33–55) [in English].
15. Dyment, J.E. & O'Connell, T.S. (2003). Journal writing in experiential education: possibilities, problems, and recommendations. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED479358.pdf [in English].
16. Fanselow, J.F. (1988) “Let’s See”: Contrasting Conversations About Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 22 (Issue 1, March 1988), (pp. 113–130) [in English].
17. Gebhard, J.G. (1996) Awareness of teaching: approaches, benefits, tasks. T. Kral (Eds.), Teacher development: making the right moves. (pp. 34–47) [in English].
18. Glatthorn, A. (1995) Teacher Development. A. Aderson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd edition), (p. 41). London: Pergamon Press [in English].
19. Hastings, S. (2003). Questioning. Teacher Tools, 14. Retrieved from: www.londongt.org/teachertools[in English].
20. Lynch, T. (1996). Communication in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press [in English].
21. Malamah-Thomas, A. (1987). Classroom Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press [in English].
22. Moskowitz, G. (1967) The FLint system: an observational tool for the foreign language classroom. Mirrors for behavior: an anthology of classroom observation instruments. A. Simon and E.G. Boyer (Eds.). Section 15, (pp. 1-15). Philadelphia: Center for the Study of Teaching at Temple University [in English].
23. Richards, J.C. & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
24. Seedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: Possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50 (1), (pp. 16-24) [in English].
25. Sinclair, J.M. & Coulthard R.M (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.