Andrii Trofimov, Daria Trofimova. Cross-Cultural Study of Personality’s Spontaneity Development.

(2016) Science and education, 9, 182-187. Odessa.

 Andrii Trofimov, 

PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences), associate professor, 

Department of Developmental Psychology, 

Daria Trofimova, 

PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences), 

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv,

60, Volodymyrska Str., Kyiv, Ukraine


CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY OF PERSONALITY’S SPONTANEITY DEVELOPMENT


SUMMARY:

The article deals with the conceptual model of personality’s spontaneity development research considering the age of early adulthood and factors that may affect it. There is a significant correlation between spontaneity and all studied personal properties (such as tolerance for uncertainty, general internality, achievements internality, failure internality, family relations internality, occupational internality, interpersonal internality, health internality, self-regulation, creativity, autonomy, spontaneity, communication flexibility). Creativity, autonomy, and tolerance for uncertainty have the greatest impact on spontaneity index. The age factor is more powerful in the context of developmental features of spontaneity compared to the socio-cultural one. Features of the environment, in which a person grew, are important and affect the level of her/his spontaneity, however spontaneity acquires its climax at the age of 23-29, which is the same for different countries and cultures. The following three factors, according to the variables, have been distinguished: “Components of personal freedom”, “Signs of creative personality” and “Signs of family communication”. The results of the factor analysis are important for studying the peculiarities of personality’s spontaneity development, as they provide the opportunity to see, which factor the spontaneity is involved into and what kind of the contribution it brings to it. This makes it possible to consider spontaneity in the “active cooperation” with other personal properties and find out that personal freedom and signs of a creative personality can be formed as a result of this interaction.


KEYWORDS:

spontaneity, creativity, subjective control, cross-cultural research.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

 

1. Dorofeev, D. Yu. (2005). Bog i svoboda, gumanizm i vera: Erazm Rotterdamskiy i Martin Lyuter o vole i predopredelenii [God and freedom, humanism and faith: Erasmus of Rotterdam and Martin Luther about free will and predestination]. Vestn. Gumanitar. fakulteta S.-Peterb. gos. unta telekommunikatsiy –Bulletin of the faculty of Humanities St. Petersburg state University of telecommunications, 2, 234-259 [in Russian].

 

2. Kant, I. (1995). Kritika prakticheskogo razuma [Critique of practical mindset].Saint Petersburg: Nauka [in Russian].

 

3. Moreno, Ya. (1993). Teatr spontannosti [Theatre of spontaneity].Krasnoyarsk: F. Mental. Zdorovya [in Russian].

 

4. Nalimov, V. V. (1989). Spontannost soznaniya [The spontaneity of consciousness]. Moscow [in Russian].

 

5. Fromm, E. (2009). Begstvo ot svobody [Escape from freedom].Moscow: AST [in Russian].

 

6. Lowen, A. (2013). Pleasure: A Creative Approach to Life. The Alexander Lowen Foundation [in English].

 

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2024 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.