Luchkiv V. Z. Age Peculiarities of Gender Differences of Empathy Determination of Assertiveness.

(2016) Science and education, 5, 205-211. Odessa.

Vitaliia Luchkiv,
post-graduate student,
Zhytomyr State University named after Ivan Franko,
40, Velyka Berdychivska Str., Zhytomyr, Ukraine



AGE PECULIARITIES OF GENDER DIFFERENCES OF
EMPATHY DETERMINATION OF ASSERTIVENESS


SUMMARY:

Due to the contradictory changes of the modern society, the studying of the phenomena which help an individual not only withstand the crisis events, but also become a successful psychologically healthy person able to assert his/her interests, goals, and achieve them, becomes especially relevant. It is assertiveness which contains the mentioned competencies, so it is very important to study not only this phenomenon itself, but also factors of its development, in particular its empathy determination. Empathy helps to penetrate into the inner world of another person, to understand him/her and to find optimal ways of interaction. In this regard, the article examines the characteristics of the age dynamics of integrated empathy and its forms as determinants of gender differences in the development and manifestation of assertiveness in adolescence. The following research methods were used: cross-sectional method, empirical (testing), qualitative and quantitative analysis. The study had three stages. At the first one, the peculiarities of the ontogenetic dynamics of the integral empathy and its forms were examined. The second one involved studying the features of the ontogenetic dynamics of assertiveness and assertive behaviour. The third step was aimed at finding and analysing the relations between the components of the integrated empathy, its forms and assertiveness of male and female respondents. The experiment involved 360 boys and girls aged from 17 to 22 years. It has been proved that the gender differences in the ontogenetic dynamics of empathy are manifested in its polar forms (aggression – altruism, indifference – real assistance not against oneself) and in the period of adolescence in both sexes the frequency of manifestations of empathy, sympathy does not significantly change. In general, the girls’ positive dynamics of empathy is more intense compared to the male respondents. The positive dynamics of assertive behaviour strategies is also observed in them. Male respondents have the negative tendencies in the age dynamics of assertiveness. Indifference and empathy are considered as factors of aggressive assertiveness in girls, and compassion – in male surveyed. Antiempathy, compassion, modelling of facilitating behaviour (girls); sympathy (boys), which determine the assertive compromise strategies of behaviour, cause only partial consideration of other people’s interests and the satisfaction of their own ones. The developed ability to empathise (girls) and the lack of propensity for empathy (girls and boys) contribute to the assertive behaviour (cooperation).


KEYWORDS:

аssertiveness, assertive behaviour, integrated empathy, forms of empathy, gender differences, adolescence.


FULL TEXT:


REFERENCES:

1. Zhuravlova, L. P. (2007). Psikholohiia empatii [Psychology of Empathy]. Zhytomyr [in Ukrainian].
2. Zhuravlova, L. P. (2010). Diagnostyka form ta typiv empatii [Diagnosis of forms and types of empathy]. Psykholohiia. Zb. nauk. prats NPU im. M. P. Drahomanova – Psychology. Collection of scientific papers NPU named by M. Dragomanov, 31(55), 154-161 [in Ukrainian].
3. Kapponi, V., Novak, T. (1998). Sam sebe psikholog [One's own psychologist]. Saint Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
4. Raigorodskii, D. I. (2006). Prakticheskaia psikhodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy. Uchebnoe posobie [Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests.]. Bachrach, Samara [in Russian].
5. Poyrazli, S., Arbona, C., Bullington, R., Pisecco, S. J. (2001). Adjustment problems of Turkish international student studying in the U.S., Coll. Stud., 35, 52-62 [in English].
6. Jinsi, A. J. (2006). Self Assertiveness and Emotional Intelligence of Higher Secondary Students, Unpublished M. Ed dissertation, Farook Training College, University of Calicut [in English].
7. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K.L., Gilchrist, J., & Gallois, (2003). Evaluations of performance feedback. Management Communication Quarterly, (Vol.16), (pp. 341-379) [in English].
8. Ryan, E. B., Anas, A. P., Mays, H. (2008). Assertiveness by Older Adults with Visual Impairment: Context Matters. Educational erotology, (Vol. 34), pp. 512-515 [in English]. 9. Wilson, K.L., & Gallois, C. (1993). Assertion and its social context. Pergamon, Oxford [in English].

  fnsnf visegrad fund da                                                                 eua konfucius   
Яндекс.Метрика
 
  tempus pedpresa mon.gov observatory