Oleksandr Voronov. INFLUENCE OF ACTIVITY ON THE QUALITY OF MANAGERIAL DECISIONS IN THE SPHERE OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT.

(2016) Science and education, 11, 5-10. Odessa.

Oleksandr Voronov,
PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences), associate professor,
doctoral student of State Management Department,
National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine,
20, Ezhena Pottier Str., Kyiv, Ukraine


INFLUENCE OF ACTIVITY ON THE QUALITY OF MANAGERIAL DECISIONS IN THE SPHERE OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT


SUMMARY:

The relevance of the formation of citizens’ social activity, their readiness for self-organisation for solving their prob- lems and participation in the processes of formation of public management in Ukraine has been considered. It has been proven that the position of certain public authority bodies that avoid making necessary decisions leads to decline in social activity of citizens. The aim of the research is the analysis of functioning of the phenomenon of individual activity in the sphere of public management and its impact on making managerial decisions. The basic task of the scientific research is the formation and approbation of psychological mechanisms of improvement of personal activity of public servants in the processes of making managerial decisions. In the course of the research, analytical method, questioning, and method of diagnosis of a personality’s motivation for success by T. Elers was used. The activity of the person who makes decisions plays a leading role in this process and appears permanently in its different phases. The results of the questioning of the Master-degree students majoring in public management concerning the systematisation of problematics of individual activ- ity increase in the process of making decisions by public servants have been presented. The impact of motivation of public servants on their activity in the processes of making managerial decisions has been reviewed. Public servants with the average and moderately high level of motivation for success form the basic groups according to the quantitative character- istics. Administrators of public authority bodies have high rates according to the average, moderately high and ultrahigh levels of motivation for success. High motivation for success promotes their active participation in the processes of making decisions, but causes low level of disposition to making risky decisions. The model of influence of activity on making decisions in the sphere of public management has been developed. Structurally the model is divided into three levels: indi- vidual activity of public servants, group activity (inherent to public management bodies) and social activity of people from regions of Ukraine. Study of influence of public servants’ individual activity on making risky decisions in public manage- ment bodies is considered to be basic direction of further research. 


KEYWORDS:

activity, decision-making, public management, social activity, model, motivation.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Abulkhanova, K. A., Berezina, T. N. (2001). Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni [Time of personality and time of life]. Sankt-Peterburg : Aleteyya [in Russian].
2. Bernshteyn, N. A. (1990). Fiziologiya dvizheniy i aktivnosti [Physiology of movement and activ- ity]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
3. Grabovska, S., Choliy S. (2010). Sotsialna aktyvnist v protsesi sotsializatsii osobystosti [Social activ- ity in process of personality socialization]. Problemy zahalnoi ta pedahohichnoi psykholohii: zbirnyk nauko- vykh prats Instytutu psykholohii im. G. S. Kostyuka APN Ukrayiny – Issues of general and pedagogical psychol- ogy: collection of scientific researches of G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Edu- cational Sciences of Ukraine, 1, 171-181. S. D. Mak- symenko (Ed.). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
4. Grimak. L. P. (1991). Obshchenie s soboy: nachala psikhologii aktivnosti [Communication with oneself: principles of psychology of activity]. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian]. 5. Golubeva, E. A. (2005). Sposobnosti. Lichnost. Individualnost [Ability. Personality. Individuality]. Dubna: «Feniks+» [in Russian].
6. Karpov, A. V. (1993). Problema prinyatiya resheniya v trudovoy deyatelnosti [The issue of making decisions in labour activity]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological journal, 3, 3-14 [in Russian].
7. Kireeva, Z. A. (2013). Razvitie lichnosti v ramkakh prostranstvenno-vremennoy organizatsii zhiznennogo puti [Development of personality within spatio-temporal organisation of course of life]. Visnyk ONU im. I. I. Mechnikova. Psikhologiya – Bulletin of I. I. Mechnikov Odessa National University. Psychology, 18, 68-73 [in Ukrainian].
8. Klyucharev, V. A., Shmids, A. M., Shestakova, A. N. (2011). Neyroekonomika: neyrobiologiya prinyatiya resheniy [Neuroeconomics: reurobiology of making deci- sions]. Ekperimentalnaya psikhologiya – Experimantal psy- chology, 4, 14-35 [in Russian].
9. Kostenok, I. V. (2014). Osoblyvosti suchasnoyi paradyhmy publichnoho upravlinnya v Ukrayini [Specif- ics of present paradigm of public management in Ukraine ]. Menedzher – Manager, 1(67), 94-100 [in Ukrainian].
10. Nort, D. (1997). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutes, institu- tional changes and functioning of economics]. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala» [in Russian].
11. Petrovskiy, V. A. (1992). Psikhologiya neadaptivnoy aktivnosti [Psychology of nonadaptive ac- tivity ]. Moscow: TOO «Gorbunok» [in Russian].
12. Rozanova, V. A. (1999). Psikhologiya upravleniya [Psychology of management]. Moscow [in Russian].
13. Cherneta, S. (2015). Sotsialna aktyvnist osobystosti yak umova rozvytku suchasnoho ukrayinskoho suspilstva [Social activity as the condition of development of present Ukrainian society]. Naukovyi visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Lesi Ukrayinky. Pedahohichni nauky – Scientific bul- letin of Lesya Ukrainka East European National Univer- sity. Pedagogy, 1, 177-180 [in Ukrainian].
14. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Series: Perspectives in Social Psychology. New York, Plenum [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2020 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.