Huang Jingsheng. THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE FORMATION OF FUTURE FINE ART TEACHERS’ AESTHETIC WORLDVIEW.

(2016) Science and education, 10, 200-205. Odessa.

Huang Jingsheng,
post-graduate student, Department of Pedagogy,
South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky,
26, Staroportofrankivska Str., Odesa, Ukraine


THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE FORMATION OF
FUTURE FINE ART TEACHERS’ AESTHETIC WORLDVIEW


SUMMARY:

The article deals with the philosophic and psychological approaches to studying the issue of future of Fine Art teachers’ aesthetic worldview, as well as its pedagogical context. The main parameter of the scientific substantiation of the essence and structure of aesthetic worldview of Fine Art teachers is its relation to another complex integrative phenomenon – aesthetic consciousness. The author interprets aesthetic consciousness on the basis of research works by leading scientists (classics and contemporary ones). According to the results of scientific literature review, the author specifies aesthetic worldview as a system of beliefs, view of the nature, world, society, and place of a man in it, as well as beliefs, ideals, and principles of reality perception. Considering the complexity and variety of interpretations of aesthetic worldview and aesthetic consciousness, the author also analyses the connection of aesthetic worldview and creative capabilities of a Fine Art teacher with his/her initiative in overcoming stability of artistic activities by means of creativity. Following the results of the current research, aesthetic worldview has been defined as personality’s ability to organise his/her work according to the humanitarian way of perceiving the image of the world, artistic tendency, artistic culture, which is manifested through positive attitude to the profession by means of forming corresponding aesthetic images of educational work in ones’ consciousness.


KEYWORDS:

 personality’s view of the world, aesthetic consciousness, a future teacher of Fine Art.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Andrushchenko, T. I. (2007). Fenomen estetychnoho (filosofsko-istorychnyi analiz) [The phenomenon of the aesthetic (philosophic and historic review)]. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
2. Bekh, I. D. (2003). Vykhovannia osobystosti : navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk [Education: textbook]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
3. Mazepa, V. I., Azarkhyn, A. A., Horskyi, V.S. (1988). Estetychne vykhovannia: dovidnyk [Aesthetic education: guide]. Kyiv: Politvydav Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
4. Zhbankova, Y. Y. (2001). Mirovozzrenie [Worldview]. Vsemirnaya entsyklopediya: Filosofiya – Time encyclopedia: philosophy. Moscow: AST [in Ukrainian].
5. Zelena, I. O. (2010). Osoblyvosti formuvannia estetychnoho svitohliadu maibutnikh uchyteliv predmetiv humanitarnoho tsyklu [Peculiarities of the formation of aesthetic worldview of future humanities teachers]. Naukovyi chasopys NPU ys. M. P. Drahomanova – Dragomanov scientific bulletin, 12, 130-134. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
6. Ziaziun, I. A. (2006). Estetychni zasady rozvytku osobystosti [Aesthetic foundations of personal development]. Mystetstvo u rozvytku osobystosti : monohrafiia – Arts in personal development: monograph (pp. 14-36). Chernivtsi : Zelena Bukovyna [in Ukrainian].
7. Kondrashova, L. V. (2001). Gumanizatsiya pedagogicheskogo protsessa v sovremennoy shkole: istoriya i sovremennost [Humanosation of the educational process in modern school: history and modernity]. Minsk: Bestprynt [in Ukrainian].
8. Konovets, S. V. (2012). Teoretychni ta metodychni osnovy tvorchoho rozvytku maibutnikh uchyteliv obrazotvorchoho mystetstva u vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh [Theoretical and methodical bases of creative development of future Art teachers at higher educational institutions]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Muzyka, O. Ya. (2008). Tvorchi zdibnosti i osobystist vchytelia obrazotvorchoho mystetstva [Creative abilities and peculiarities of Arts teacher]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu – Bulletin of Cherkasy university, 129, 70-74. Cherkasy: Vyd. Vid. ChNU imeni Bohdana Khmelnytskoho [in Ukrainian].
10. Pokrovshchuk, L. M. (2005). Kompiuterni tekhnolohii u tvorchomu rozvytku vchyteliv obrazotvorchoho mystetstva: Metodychnyi posibnyk [IT technologies in the creative development of Fine Arts teachers]. Kherson, Ailant [in Ukrainian].
11. Tarasenko, H. S. (2006). Vzaiemozviazok estetychnoi ta ekolohichnoi pidhotovky vchytelia v systemi profesiinoi osvity: monohrafiia [Interrelation of aesthetic and ecological training of a teacher in the system of professional education: monograph]. Cherkasy: Vertykal [in Ukrainian].
12. Shinkaruk, V. I., Ivanov, V. P., Mikhalchenko, N. I. (1988). Mirovozzrenie kak forma obshchestvennogo samosoznaniya cheloveka i sposob dukhovnoprakticheskogo osvoeniya mira [Worldview as a form of social self-consciousness and a wat of spiritual and practical cognition of the world]. Nauchnoe mirovozzrenie i sotsialisticheskaya kultura – Scientific worldview and socialistic culture (pp. 12-29). Kiev : Nauk. Dumka [in Russian].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2020 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.