Svitlana Bodnar.  The educational paradigm shift for student-centred learning in the process of globalisation.

(2016) Science and education, 10, 102-108. Odessa.

Svitlana Bodnar,
PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), professor, Head of Foreign Languages Department,
Odessa Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics,
6, 25th Chapaiev Division Str., Odesa, Ukraine


THE EDUCATIONAL PARADIGM SHIFT FOR STUDENT-CENTRED LEARNING IN THE PROCESS OF GLOBALISATION


SUMMARY:

The article deals with the problem of the educational paradigm shift from the teacher-centred conception to the studentcentred learning conception. The notion of “student-centred learning” has been under study. The student-centred learning conception has been analyzed. Strategies of self-directed study of a foreign language have been investigated; the autonomy levels have been specified; the most effective methods and techniques which are used in the student-centred learning have been singled out. The project work as one of the student-centred learning technique has been accentuated on.


KEYWORDS:

student-centred learning, non-linguistic students, foreign languages, strategies of self-directed study, project work.


FULL TEXT:

 


REFERENCES:

1. Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning – A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change. (pp. 13-25) [in English].
2. Burnard, P. (1999). Carl Rogers and postmodernism: Challenged in nursing and health sciences. Nursing and Health Sciences, 1, 241-247 [in English].
3. Milanovic, M. (Ed.). (2002). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Language examining and test development. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division [in English].
4. Edmondson, W., House, J. (2000). Einführung in die Sprachlehrforschung. Tübingen: Franke [in German].
5. Fried-Booth, D. L. (1990). Project Work. Oxford Uni
versity Press [in English].
6. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon [in English].
7. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics conceptions of teaching. Learning and instruction, 7(3), 255-275 [in English].
8. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Trinity College [in English].
9. Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
10. O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Studentcentered learning: What does it mean for students and lectures? University College Dublin. Retrieved from: http://www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1/oneill-mcmahonTues_19th_Oct_SCL.pdf [in English].
11. O’Sullivan, M. (2004). The reconceptualisation of learner-centred approaches: A Nambian case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 24 (6), 585-602 [in English].
12. Ribe, R. (1993). Project Work. Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching [in English].
13. Roger, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80’s. 2 nd ed., rev. Merrill: [in English].
14. Rogoff, B. (1999). Cognitive development through social interaction: Vygotsky and Piaget. Learners, learning and assessment. P. Murphy (Ed.). London: Open University Press [in English].
15. Simon, B. (1999). Why no pedagogy in England? Learners and Pedagogy. J. Leach and B. Moon (Eds.). London: Sage Publications [in English].
16. Tarnopolsky, O. B. (2001). The scale of learner autonomy: Three levels in an intensive English programme. Independence. Newsletter of the IATEFL Learner Independence Special Interest Group, 29, 1-5 [in English].
17. Taylor, P. G. (2000). Changing Expectations: Preparing students for Flexible Learning. The International Journal of Academic Development, 5(2), 107-115 [in English].

         

       
   
   
         

 

©2020 Університет Ушинського. Всі права захищені, мабуть.