// Наука і освіта. – 2022. – №2. – 81-89.
Olena Miroshnychenko,
Candidate of Sciences (Pedagogy), Associate Professor,
Associate Professor at the Department of Professional and Pedagogical, Special Education,
Andragogy and Management,
Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University,
40, Velika Berdychivska str., Zhytomyr, Ukraine
Oleksandr Voznyuk,
Doctor of Sciences (Pedagogy), Associate Professor,
Professor at the Department of English with Teaching Methods in Preschool and Primary Education
Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University,
40, Velika Berdychivska str., Zhytomyr, Ukraine
DYNAMICS OF INDICATORS OF ADAPTATION TO LIFE IN THE ANTARCTICA AMONG POLAR EXPLORERS OF DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS
АНОТАЦІЯ:
The scientific developments of domestic and foreign researchers dealing with the problem of adaptation to life in extreme conditions are analysed. The relevance of the article stems from the fact that Ukraine is one of the 29 countries in the world that has a permanent scientific station in Antarctica. Since 1995, Ukraine has had the opportunity to conduct longitudinal research under the State Targeted Scientific and Technical Research Program in Antarctica. The main issue of the direction of medical and physiological research, within which our scientific work takes place, is the psychological training of Ukrainian winterers who stay for a long time (12–13 months) at the Antarctic station. The concept of psychological adaptation to life in extreme conditions is specified; the types of accentuations of Ukrainian winterers are determined; methodological tools of psychological research are presented. The main accentuations that are characteristic of winterers of different age groups are highlighted, and the peculiarities of personality behaviour with different types of accentuations are outlined. The analysis of the research on the role of winterers’ accentuation in the process of adaptation to extreme living conditions being conducted during 10 years has showed that the main types of accentuation in the winterers are as follows: hyperthymic, emotional, stuck and demonstrative. These accentuations of character mainly contribute to the successful psychological adaptation of winterers to life in Antarctica. The types of accentuations (conformity, dysthymia, anxiety, instability, schizoid orientation), which may interfere with psychological adaptation, has a small percentage of representation in the winterers, or are not represented at all. The results of the study have proved that the psychological adaptation of Ukrainian winterers to extreme conditions has a complex hierarchical structure and is formed on the basis of individual qualities and the influence of appropriate natural, interpersonal and professional conditions. Such results enable defining new criteria for psychophysiological and psychological monitoring and forecasting concerning personality adaptation to extreme living conditions.
КЛЮЧОВІ СЛОВА:
adaptation, groups of personalities by types of accentuations, extreme living conditions.
ПОВНИЙ ТЕКСТ СТАТТІ:
ЛІТЕРАТУРА:
1. Леонгард К. Акцентуированные личности. Киев : Вища школа, 1981. 392 с.
2. Мірошниченко О., Гуцуляк О., Марченко О. Впровадження діагностичних процедур і тренінгових програм у психологічну підготовку та реабілітацію зимівників. Український антарктичний журнал. 2017. № 16. С. 178–187.
3. Налчаджян А. Психологическая адаптация: механизмы и стратегии. Москва : Эксмо, 2010. 368 с.
4. Affective, social and cognitive outcomes during a 1-year wintering in Concordia / M. Nicolas, P. Suedfeld, K. Weiss, M. Gaudino. Environment and Behavior. 2016. Vol. 48. Iss. 8. Р. 1073–1091. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916515583551.
5. Bakhmutova L. Factors and models of interpersonal interaction of participants in long-term Ukrainian Antarctic Expeditions. Fundamental and applied researches in practice of leading scientific schools. 2019. Vol. 36. № 6. Р. 48–55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2019.6.6.
6. Barbarito M., Baldanza S., Peri A. Evolution of the oping strategies in an isolated group in an Antarctic base. Polar Record. 2001. Vol. 37. Iss. 201. Р. 111–120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400026930.
7. Different adaptations of Chinese winter-over expeditioners during prolonged Antarctic and sub-Antarctic residence / Nan Chen, Quan Wu, Hao Li, Tao Zhang, Chengli Xu. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2016. Vol. 60. Iss. 5. Р. 737–747. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1069-8.
8. Dotlich D., Cairo P. Why CEOs Fail. New York : Jossey Bass, 2003. 435 р.
9. En polarekspedisjon i motbør – opplevelser og psykiske reaksjoner / S. Steine, K. Steine, G. Sandbæk, A. Røseth. Tidsskrift for den Norske lægeforening. 2003. Vol. 123. № 24. S. 3524–3528.
10. Furnham A., Milner R., Akhtar R. A review of the measures designed to assess DSM-5 personality disorders. Psychology. 2014. Vol. 5. Iss. 14. Р. 1646–1686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.514175.
11. Furnham A., Trickey G., Hyde G. Bright aspects to dark side traits: dark side traits associated with work success. Personality and Individual Differences. 2012. Vol. 52. Iss. 8. Р. 908–913. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.025.
12. Hogan R., Hogan J. Hogan Development Survey : manual. Tulsa : Hogan Assessment Systems, 2009. 199 р.
13. Khandelwal S., Bhatia A., Mishra A. Psychological health in the summer team of an Indian expedition to Antarctica. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour. 2015. Vol. 20. Iss. 2. Р. 65–70. DOI: 10.4103/0971-8990.174596.
14. Levels of anxiety in polar environments / J. Mocellin, P. Suedfeld, J. Bernadelz, M. Barbarito. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1991. Vol. 11. Iss. 3. Р. 265–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80187-2.
15. Mehlhorn B., Mehlhorn H. Antarctica: The Peculiar World. Biodiversity and Evolution of Parasitic Life in the Southern Ocean : monograph / S. Klimpel, Th. Kuhn, H. Mehlhorn (eds.). Cham : Springer, 2017. Р. 7–12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46343-8_2.
16. Mehta M., Chugh G. Achievement Motivation and Adjustment in Members of Indian Scientific Expedition to Antarctica. Psychological Studies. 2011. Vol. 56. № 4. P. 404–409. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0109-7.
17. Miller L. From Difficult to Disturbed: Understanding and Managing Dysfunctional Employees. New York : Amacom, 2008. 310 p.
18. Mullin Ch. Some psychological aspects of isolated Antarctic living. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1960. Vol. 117. Iss. 4. Р. 323–325. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.117.4.323.
19. Oldham J., Morris L. The New Personality Self-Portrait: Why You Think, Work, Love and Act the Way You Do. New York : Bantam, 1995. 449 p.
20. Palinkas L. Mental and cognitive performance in the cold. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 2001. Vol. 60. Iss. 3. Р. 430–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2001.12113048.
21. Palinkas L. The psychology of isolated and confined environments: Understanding human behavior in Antarctica. American Psychologist. 2003. Vol. 58. Iss. 5. Р. 353–363. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.353.
22. Palinkas L., Houseal M. Stages of change in mood and behavior during a winter in Antarctica. Environment and Behavior. 2000. Vol. 32. Iss. 1. Р. 128–141. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972469.
23. Palinkas L., Suedfeld P. Psychological effects of polar expeditions. Lancet. 2008. Vol. 371. Iss. 9607. Р. 153–163. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61056-3.
24. Perilygina L., Mykhlyuk Е. The dynamics of manifestation of professionally caused accentuations in employees of the state emergency service of Ukraine. Development and modernization of social sciences: experience of Poland and prospects of Ukraine : collective monograph. Lublin : Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”, 2017. Vol. 2. Р. 305–322.
25. Physiological and cognitive responses to an Antarctic expedition: A Case Report / A. Solanas, B. O’Neill, T. Morris, J. Dunbar. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2016. Vol. 11. Iss. 8. Р. 1053–1059.
26. Psychological Adaptation to Extreme Environments: Antarctica as a Space Analogue / C. Tortello, M. Barbarito, J. Cuiuli, D. Golombek, D. Vigo, S. Plano. Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal. 2018. Vol. 9. Iss. 4. Art. 555768. DOI: 10.19080/PBSIJ.2018.09.555768.
27. Sannikov O. Information system operator: the structure and components of personal choice. Наука і освіта. 2016. № 7. С. 133–143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2016-7-22.
28. Schmieschek H. Fragebogen zur Ermittlung akzentuierter Persönlichkeiten. Psychiatrie, Neurologie und medizinische Psychologie. 1970. Vol. 22. № 10. S. 378–381.
29. Study of Ukrainian Polar Explorers’ Readiness for Extreme Environments at the Antarctic station / O. Miroshnychenko, I. Pasichnyk, A. Voznyuk, S. Kubitskyi, M. Roganova, H. Tsvietkova, I. Shorobura, I. Bloshchynskyi. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences. 2020. Vol. 8. № 6. Р. 455–461. DOI: 10.13189/saj.2020.080618.
30. Suedfeld P. Polar psychology: An overview. Environment and Behavior. 1991. Vol. 23. Iss. 6. Р. 653–665. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916591236001.
31. Suedfeld P., Weiss K. Antarctica: Natural laboratory and space analogue for psychological research. Environment and Behavior. 2000. Vol. 32. Iss. 1. Р. 7–17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972405.