(2018) Science and education, 2, 186-192. Odessa.

Larysa Savchenko,
Doctor of Pedagogy, associate professor,
head of the Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Technological Education,
Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University,
54, Haharin Avenue, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine

FUNCTIONAL ROLE OF MONITORING IN ASSESSING
THE QUALITY OF FUTURE HANDICRAFT TEACHER TRAINING

The paper aims to investigate the specificity of using education quality monitoring as a mechanism of assessing the quality of future teachers training. The comparative analysis of the national system of educational indicators of monitoring with the systems of educational indicators of other countries of the world has been carried out. This has made it possible to design an algorithm for assessing the quality, efficiency, and availability of education in our country compared to others. It has been found that today the international practice operates several means of measuring the educational achievements of students: PISA; TIMSS; PIRLS; IEAP; CIVICS; SITES, but unfortunately there is an urgent need to develop and implement an effective and reliable model of education quality monitoring in terms of future teachers training in Ukraine. The education quality monitoring in terms of future specialists training at all educational levels is carried out according to educational and professional programs in two directions: staged, or continuous. The following types of education quality monitoring have been distinguished: diagnostic, expert, control, accompanying pedagogical monitoring. The following kinds of group monitoring of the education quality into the future handicraft teacher training have been implemented: Delphi method; simulation of pedagogical situations of different levels of complexity; web quests (School Rating); business games consisting of different contests; creative tasks and others.

monitoring, educational services, quality of education, future specialist, diagnostics, technological direction.

1. Bitinas, B.P., Kataeva L.I. (1993). Pedagogicheskaia diagnostika: sushchnost, funktsii, perspektivy [Pedagogical diagnostics: essence, functions, perspectives]. Pedagogika – Pedagogy, 3, 10-15 [in Russian].
2. Stepko, M.F., Bolyubash, Ya. Ya., Shynkaruk, V.D., Grubinko, V.V., Babin, I. I. (2003). Bolonskyi protses u faktakh i dokumentakh (Sorbonna − Bolonia − Salamanka − Praha-Berlin) [Bologna Process in Facts and Documents (Sorbonne - Bologna - Salamanca - Prague-Berlin)]. Ternopil: View of the TPU them. V. Hnatyuk [in Ukrainian].
3. Viktorov, V.G. (2004). Atestatsiia i akredytatsiia zakladiv osvity v systemi upravlinnia yakistiu [Attestation and accreditation of educational institutions in the system of quality management]. Multyversum. Filosofskyi almanakhMultiversum – Philosophical Almanac, 43. Kyiv: Center for Spiritual Culture [in Ukrainian].
4. Grinevich, L. Standarty navchalnykh dosiahnen yak skladova monitorynhu yakosti osvity v SShA [Standards of academic achievements as a component of monitoring the quality of education in the United States]. Retrieved from: http://library.udpu.org.ua/library_files/poriv_ped_stydii/2011/2011_3_21. 11 [in Ukrainian].
5. Lukina, T. (2006). Monitorynh yakosti osvity. Teoriia i praktyka [Monitoring the quality of education. Theory and Practice]. Kyiv: Publishing House "School World" [in Ukrainian].
6. Matros, D. Sh., Polev, D.M., Melnikova, N. N. (2001). Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovaniia na osnove novykh informatsionnykh tekhnologii i obrazovatelnogo monitoringa [Management of the quality of education on the basis of new information technologies and educational monitoring]. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia [in Russian].
7. Podlasy, I.P. (1998). Diahnostyka ta ekspertyza pedahohichnykh proektiv: navchalnyi posibnyk [Diagnostics and expertise of pedagogical projects]. Kyiv: Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
8. Shamova, T. I., Davydenko, T. M. (2001). Upravlenie obrazovatelnym protsessom v adaptivnoi shkole: monografiia [Management of the educational process in the adaptive school: monograph]. Moscow: Center "Pedagogical search" [in Russian].
9. Shatalov, A.A., Afanasyev, V.V., Afanasyeva, I.V., Gvozdeva, E.A., Pichugina, A.M. (2008). Monitoring i diagnostika kachestva obrazovaniia: monografiia [Monitoring and Diagnostics of Quality of Education: monograph]. Moscow: Research Institute of School Technologies [in Russian].
10. Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F. & Hasting, J. T. (1971). Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill [in English].
11. Carol Taylor, Fitz-Gibbon. (1996). Monitoring Education: Indicators, Quality and Effectiveness. Cassel [in English].
12.Reimers, N.F. (1990). Nature management. Dictionary reference book. Moscow: Thought [in English].
13.UniTest System. Retrieved from: http://sight2k.com/rus/unitest/ [in English].