(2023) Science and education, 2, 54-60. Odessa.
Snizhana Osypchuk,
Graduate Student,
Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University,
27, Khmelnytske shoes str., Vinnytsia, Ukraine,
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-418X
THE PROBLEM OF ASSESSING EDUCATION QUALITY OF GENERAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION IN RETROSPECTIVE OF PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH
SUMMARY:
This article presents an overview of the problem of evaluating the quality of education in a comprehensive educational institution in the retrospective of pedagogical research. The issue of the quality of education is a priority in the development of society, since the further successful life of mankind in all spheres depends on the “end product” of educational institutions – a competitive graduate. And it is the retrospective study of this issue that will help determine the essence of the main concepts, problems and their solutions. The concept of “quality”, “quality of education”, “evaluation” is considered as the process of obtaining estimates, conclusions, recommendations regarding the state and prospects of the development of an educational institution based on predetermined criteria. The quality of education is considered in the inseparable unity of the quality of educational activity and the quality of the result. Accordingly, the article proves that in order to ensure a high level of education quality in educational institutions, it is necessary to evaluate educational activity and its results, requirements for evaluation criteria are formulated. However, the issue of evaluating the quality of education and educational activity requires continued scientific research, as general secondary education institutions are not ready to carry out evaluations: lack of tools for the evaluation process, unwillingness of participants in the educational process to evaluate the activities of the institution, incompetence of experts, biased evaluation.
KEYWORDS:
quality, quality of education, quality of educational activity, evaluation, internal system of ensuring the quality of education.
FULL TEXT:
REFERENCES:
1. Bobrovskyi, M.V., Horbachov, S.I., & Zaplotynska, O.O. (2020). Rekomendatsii do pobudovy vnutrishnoi systemy zabezpechennia yakosti osvity u zakladi zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Recommendations for building an internal system for ensuring the quality of education in an institution of generalsecondary education]. Kyiv : Derzhavna sluzhba yakosti osvity, 240 [in Ukrainian].
2. Bulakh, I.Ie., Volosovets, O.P., & Voronenko Yu.V. ta in. (2003). Systema upravlinnia yakistiu medychnoi osvity v Ukraini: monohrafiia [The quality management system of medical education in Ukraine]. Dnipropetrovsk : ART-PRES, 212 [in Ukrainian].
3. Bulakh, I.Ye., Liashenko, O.I., Mruha, M.R., Sereda, L.I. (2009). Naukove obgruntuvannia pidkhodiv do shkaliuvannia rezultativ zovnishnoho nezalezhnoho otsiniuvannia [Scientific substantiation of approaches to scaling the results of external independent evaluation]. Visnyk. Testuvannia i monitorynh v osviti – Herald. Testing and Monitoring in Education, 4, 17−19 [in Ukrainian].
4. Vais, K.H. (2000). Otsiniuvannia: metody doslidzhennia prohram ta polityky [Evaluation: Methods for Program and Policy Research]. Kyiv : Osnovy, 671 [in Ukrainian].
5. Hopkinz, D. (2003). Otsiniuvannia dlia rozvytku shkoly [Assessment for school development]. Lviv : Litopys, 256 [in Ukrainian].
6. Hryhorash, V.V. (2004). Upravlinnia navchalnym zakladom: navch.-metod. posibn.: u 2-kh ch. Ch. 1. [Management of the educational institution]. Kharkiv : Ranok, 160 [in Ukrainian].
7. Humeniuk, V. (2006). Netradytsiini resursy upravlinnia yakistiu osvity [Non-traditional resources of education quality management]. Dyrektor shkoly, litseiu, himnazii – Director of a school, lyceum, gymnasium, 1, 64−69 [in Ukrainian].
8. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro osvitu” [Law of Ukraine “On Education”]. (n. d.) zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
9. Yelnykova, H.V. (2012). Teoretyko-metodychni osnovy pidhotovky kerivnykiv do otsiniuvannia rezultativ diialnosti zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu: monohrafiia [Theoretical and methodological foundations of training managers for evaluating the results of the activities of a general educational institution]. Kyiv : UMO, Ped. Dumka, 220 [in Ukrainian].
10. Kilova, H.O. (2012). Yakist osvity yak kliuchova katehoriia menedzhmentu osvity [Quality of education as a key category of management]. Osvita ta pedahohichna nauka – Education and pedagogical science, 5–6, 154−155 [in Ukrainian].
11. Kremen, V. (2003). Istoriia filosofii: pidruchnyk dlia vyshchoi shkoly [History of philosophy]. Kharkiv : Prapor, 768 [in Ukrainian].
12. Lukina, T.O. (2007). Vymiriuvannia y upravlinnia yakistiu osvity: navchalno-metodychni materialy [Measurement and management of the quality of education: teaching and methodical materials]. Kyiv : Ekspres-obiava, 50 [in Ukrainian].
13. Luniachek, V.E. (2014). Pedahohichnyi menedzhment: navch. posibn. [Pedagogical management]. Kharkiv : KharRINADU “Mahistr”, 512 [in Ukrainian].
14. Liashenko, O.I. (2012). Metodyka i tekhnolohii otsiniuvannia diialnosti zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu [Methods and technologies for evaluating the activities of a general educational institution]. Kyiv : Pedahohichna dumka, 160 [in Ukrainian].
15. Marmaza, O.I. (2006). Stratehichnyi menedzhment: traiektoriia uspikhu [Strategic management: the trajectory of success]. Xarkiv: Osnova, 160 [in Ukrainian].
16. Natsionalna doktryna rozvytku osvity [National doctrine of education development]. (n. d.) zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/347/2002#Text
17. Pro porivnialnu otsinku osvity. Rada Yevropy. Rekomendatsiia 1137 (2002). Biuleten Biuro informatsii Rady Yevropy v Ukraini. (s. 144) [in Ukrainian].
18. Shchudlo, S.A. (2012). Vyshcha osvita u poshuku yakosti: quo vadis [Higher education in search of quality: quo vadis]. Kharkiv – Drohobych : Kolo, 340 [in Ukrainian].
19. Harvey, L., Newton, J. (2007). Transforming quality evaluation: Moving on. Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation, 225–246.
