(2023) Science and education, 1, 51-57. Odessa.
Olena Myloslavska,
PhD (Candidate of Psychological Sciences),
Associate Professor at the Department of Applied Psychology,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,
4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-8182
Serhii Bohdanovskyi,
Master of the Faculty of Psychology,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,
4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, Ukraine
PECULIARITIES OF SELF-REGULATION OF MILITARY PERSONNEL WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF RESILIENCE
SUMMARY:
The article is devoted to the study of resilience as a resource of self-regulation of military personnel. The study of resilience and the specifics of the style of self-regulation of military personnel is especially relevant during a full-scale invasion. The article provides an analysis of modern theoretical and empirical research on the phenomena of resilience and self-regulation. It is noted that resilience modifies the level of self-regulation and helps in mastering new adaptive forms of behavior, determines the process of post-traumatic growth. Resilience is considered as a multidisciplinary construct, the factors of which are positive coping, positive affect, positive thinking, realism and behavioral control. Appropriate psychodiagnostic tools and mathematical and statistical methods were used to achieve the set aim of the study. The study established that a high level of resilience is reflected in significantly higher indicators of such components of self-regulation as planning and independence, as well as the general level of self-regulation. This indicates that servicemen with a high level of resilience demonstrate purposefulness in solving tasks, a tendency to more flexible planning, the ability to be critical of the results of their own activities, and an individualistic position in interpersonal interaction. It was determined that the high level of resilience of military personnel is expressed in the conscious planning of activities and the development of regulatory autonomy, as well as the formation of an individual system of conscious self-regulation of voluntary activity. In subjects with an average level of resilience, these qualities are developed to a lesser extent. In order to master new types of activities, they must develop the ability to adapt to changes, be aware of their external and internal resources, think through the ways of their actions and behavior to achieve their goals. The perspective of further studies is outlined, which consists in deepening the understanding of the construct of resilience and its relationships with other psychological phenomena.
KEYWORDS:
resilience, self-regulation style, conscious planning of activities, development of regulatory autonomy, military personnel.
FULL TEXT:
REFERENCES:
1. Balabanova, K.V. (2020). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti zhyttiezdatnosti pratsivnykiv DSNS Ukrainy [Psychology of work in special conditions]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv: NUCDU [in Ukrainian].
2. 2. Vasyliev, S.P. (2010). Osoblyvosti samorehuliatsii kursantiv v period adaptatsii do navchannia v tsyvilnomu vyshchomu navchalnomu zakladi [Pedagogical psychology] Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Khmelnytskyi: NADPSU [in Ukrainian].
3. Hrytsyna, O.M. (2018). Rozvytok psykholohichnoi stiikosti u kerivnykiv orhaniv okhorony derzhavnoho kordonu Ukrainy [Psychology of work in special conditions]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Khmelnytskyi [in Ukrainian].
4. Yevdokimova, O.O. (2015). Samorehuliatsiia yak kryterii zhyttiestiikosti kursantiv. [Self-regulation as a criterion of cadets' resilience]. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi psykholohii ta pedahohiky v diialnosti vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv MVS Ukrainy – Actual Problems of Modern Psychology and Pedagogy in the Activities of Higher Educational Institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. (pp. 13-16). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
5. Kireieva, Z., & Odnostalko, O., & Biron, B. (2020). Psykhometrychnyi analiz adaptovanoi versii shkaly rezylientnosti (CD-RISC-10) [The psychometric analysis of the adapted version of resilience scale (CD-RISC-10)]. HABITUS – HABITUS, 14, 110–117 [in Ukrainian].
6. Kolesnichenko, O.S., & Matsehora, Ya.V., & Prykhodko, I.I. (2019). Psykholohichna samo- ta vzaiemodopomoha viiskovosluzhbovtsiam Natsionalnoi hvardii Ukrainy v umovakh vedennia boiovykh dii [Psychological self- and mutual assistance to the military personnel of the National Guard of Ukraine in the conditions of combat operations]. I.I. Prykhodko (Ed.). Kharkiv: NANGU [in Ukrainian].
7. Lazos, H.P. (2018). Rezilientnist: kontseptualizatsiia poniat, ohliad suchasnykh doslidzhen [Resilience: conceptualization of concepts, review of current research]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Konsultatyvna psykholohiia i psykhoterapiia – Actual problems of psychology: Counseling psychology and psychotherapy, 14, 26–64 [in Ukrainian].
8. Lamash, I.V., & Mikailova, N.A. (2017). Zhyttiestiikist yak resurs samorehuliatsii kursantiv iz riznym dosvidom viiskovoi diialnosti [Resilience as a resource for self-regulation of cadets with different military experience]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu: Psykholohichni nauky – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University: Psychological sciences, 6 (1), 51–56 [in Ukrainian].
9. Mannapova, K.R. (2012). Zhyttiestiikist v systemi poniattia zhyttiezdatnosti [Resilience in the system of the concept of viability]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H.S. Skovorody. Psykholohiia – Bulletin of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Psychology, 44 (1), 143–150. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhnpu_psykhol_2012_44(1)__18 [in Ukrainian].
10. Olefir, V.O. (2016). Psykholohiia samorehuliatsii subiekta diialnosti [General psychology, history of psychology]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
11. Radzikovskyi, S., & Seredenko, M. (2018). Praktyka vykorystannia pryiomiv emotsiino-volovoi samorehuliatsii viiskovosluzhbovtsiv v boiovykh umovakh [The practice of using techniques of emotional and volitional self-regulation of military personnel in combat conditions]. Proceedings from ’18: Vseukrainska naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Psykhosotsialna pidrtymka osib z travmoiu viiny: mizhnarodnyi dosvid ta ukrainski realii» – All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference «Psychosocial support for people with war trauma: international experience and Ukrainian realities ». (pp. 265–267) Mariupol: DSUM [in Ukrainian].
12. Subbota, S. (2019). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti posttravmatychnoho zrostannia osobystosti [Psychological features of post-traumatic personality growth]. Psychological journal, 5.9, 259–270. URL: https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2019.5.9 [in Ukrainian].
13. Tytarenko, T.M. (2009). Zhyttiestiikist osobystosti: sotsialna neobkhidnist ta bezpeka [Personal resilience: social necessity and security]. Kyiv: Marych [in Ukrainian].
14. Chaban, O.S., & Bezsheiko, V.H. (2017). Symptomy posttravmatychnoho stresu, tryvohy ta depresii sered uchasnykiv boiovykh dii v zoni antyterorystychnoi operatsii [Symptoms of post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression among combatants in the anti-terrorist operation zone]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii – Ukrainian Journal of Psychoneurology, 25, 2 (91), 80–84 [in Ukrainian].
15. Chernobrovkina, V., & Chernobrovkin, V. (2020). Fenomen rezylientnosti u konteksti sotsio-ekolohichnoho pidkhodu i dyskursu [The phenomenon of resilience in the context of socio-ecological approach and discourse]. Psykholohiia ta psykhosotsialni interventsii – Psychology and psychosocial interventions, 3, 59–66 [in Ukrainian].
16. Yahupov, V.V., & Furs, O.Y. (2018). Osoblyvosti diahnostuvannia psykhichnoi samorehuliatsii u maibutnikh fakhivtsiv ekstremalnykh vydiv diialnosti [Peculiarities of diagnosing mental self-regulation in future specialists of extreme activities]. Orhanizatsiina psykholohiia. Ekonomichna psykholohiia – Organizational psychology. Economic psychology, 1(12), 116−123. URL: http://orgpsy-journal.in.ua/userfiles/issues/i12/n12/14 [in Ukrainian].
17. Agius, M., & Goh, C. (2010). PW01-170 – The stress-vulnerability model; how does stress impact on mental illness at the level of the brain….and what are the consequences? European Psychiatry, 25, 1591. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-9338(10)71572-8.
18. Bolton, K. (2013). Тhe development and validation of the resilience protective factors inventory: a confirmatory factor analysis. University of Texas at Arlington.
19. Brudek, P. (2013). Poczucie bezpieczeństwa i prężność osobowa jako korelaty umiejscowienia kontroli zdrowia w okresie wczesnej starości. III Międzynarodowa Konferencja Interdyscyplinarna: Bezpieczeństwo współczesnego świata – wyzwania izagrożenia. Poznań.
20. Connor, K.M., & Davidson, J.R.T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113.
21. Falewicz, A. (2016). Prężność osobowości i jej rola w procesach radzenia sobie ze stresem. Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie 23, 263–275.
22. Gabana, N. (2016). A Strenghts-Based Coginitive Behavioral Approach to Treating Depression and Building Resilience in Collegiate Athletics: The Individuation of an Identical Twin. Case Studies in Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 4–15.
23. Gąsior, K., & Chodkiewicz, J., & Cechowski, W. (2016). Kwestionariusz Oceny Prężności (KOP- 26) Konstrukcja i właściwości psychometryczne narzędzia. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 21 (1), 76–92.
24. Hanson, R., & Hanson, F. (2019) Rezyliencja. Jak ukształtować fundament spokoju, siły i szczęścia. Sopot: GWP.
25. Lepore, S.J., & Revenson, Т.A. (2006) Resilience and posttraumatic growth: recovery, resistance, and reconfiguration.
26. Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 227–238. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227.
27. Meredith, L.S. (2011). Promoting Psychological Resilience in the U. S. Military. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated.
28. Morosanova, V. I. (2013). Self-regulation and Personality. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 86, 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.596
29. Pangallo, A., Zibarras, L., Lewis, R., & Flaxman, P. (2015). Resilience through the lens of interactionism: A systematic review. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 1–20. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000024.
30. Davidson, J.R.T., Payne, V.M., Connor, K.M., Foa, E.B., Rothbaum, B.O., Hertzberg, M.A., & Weisler, R.H. (2005). Trauma, resilience and saliostasis: effects of treatment in post-traumatic stress disorder. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20(1), 43–48. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004850-200501000-00009.
