(2016) Science and education, 1, 92-97. Odessa.

Anna Hilman,
lecturer, Department of Psychology and Pedagogy,
National University “Ostroh Academy”,
2, Seminarskaia Str., Ostroh, Ukraine 

EMPIRICAL STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SANOGENIC THINKING

The article deals with the issue of sanogenic thinking diagnostics in students. Changes in the modern society, intense scientific and technological progress result in the increase of nervous tension which frequently leads to mental and nervous disorders in young people. The style of thinking in the process of perceiving, assessing and experiencing difficult life situations sometimes affects human health, promotes or hinders the success and different kinds of relationships. The peculiarities of students’ sanogenic thinking manifestation have been revealed. The experiment involving 175 students aged from 17 to 24 was conducted during 2014-2016. The experiment has shown that the students’ dominant type of thinking is pathogenic thinking, which speaks for students’ negative emotions (fear, rage, sadness) causing tension,

sanogenic thinking, pathogenic thinking, reflection, rigidity, stress tolerance, mental tolerance to stresses, level of life satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints, volitional self-regulation, personality type, motivation, type of emotional reaction, anxiety, life-sense orientations, psychological well-being, students.  

1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaia, K. A. (1991). Stratehyia zhyzny [Life strategy]. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
2. Hilman, A. Yu. (2014). Sanohenne myslennia yak chynnyk protydii emotsiinoho stresu v navchalnii diialnosti studenta [Sanogenic thinking as a factor of resistance of stresses in the educational process]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia «Psykholohiia i pedahohika» – Scientific works. Series “Psychology and Pedagogy”, 30, 43-50.Ostroh: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia» [in Ukrainian].
3. Krainova, Yu. N. (2010). Sanogennoe myshlenie protiv negativnykh perezhyvaniy [Sanogenic thinking against negative emotions]. Psykhologiya zdoroviya i lichnostnoho rosta – Psychology of health and personal growth, 4, 58-74 [in Russian].
4. Morozyuk, S. N. (2006). Sanogennyi stil myshleniya. Upravlenye emotsyiamy. «Obida». Modulno-kodovoe uchebnoe posobie v mobilnoy sisteme obuchenyia KYP-M k tsyklu kursov po beskonflyktnoi adaptatsyy y samorazvytyiu lychnosty [Sanogenic style of thinking. Controlling emotions. Offense. Module textbook in mobile system of teaching KYPM for non-conflict adaptation and self-development of personality]. Moscow [in Russian].
5. Orlov, Yu. M. (1991). Voskhozhdeniie k individualnost [Reaching individuality]. Moscow: Prosveshcheniie [in Russian].
6. Orlov, Yu. M. (2006). Ozdoravlivayushchee (sanohennoe) myshlenie. Seryia: Upravlenye povedenyem [Recreational (sanogenic) thinking. Series: Controlling behaviour]. 2nd ed. rev. Moscow: Slaiding [in Russian].
7. Tytarenko, T. M. (2007). Zhyttievi zavdannia osobystosti yak sotsialno-psykholohichnyi chynnyk modeliuvannia maibutnoho [Life tasks of a personality as a psychosocial factor of future modelling]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykhol.: zb. statei – Scientific studios on social and political psychology: collection of articles, 16(9), 304-311. Kyiv: Milenium [in Ukrainian].
8. Pasіchnik, І. D. (2013).Mislennia yak predmet psikholohіi [Thinking as a subject of Psychology]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia «Psykholohiia i pedahohika» - Scientific works. Series “Psychology and Pedagogy”, 25, 3-9. Ostroh: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia» [in Ukrainian].